########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
Santosh, Thanks for clearing that up. We get it now. You are agnostic and VERY tolerant. While this is good to know, we still don't know your specific and reasoned response to Chris Vaz's original post on this subject. Would you now address his post, please? Thanks. Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ########################################################################## --- Chris Vaz wrote: > >According to Webster's, a bigot is >someone "obstinately and intolerantly devoted to his >own beliefs." > >By that standard, everyone who holds strong beliefs >should be held to that account. That would not only >include you, Mr. Helekar, but everyone on this net, >wouldn't you agree? > No. I disagree completely. All people on this net, except Chris Vaz and another guy, are very tolerant about other people's beliefs and ideas. I, and perhaps a few others, are actually agnostic, and therefore do not hold any strong beliefs unsupported by objective evidence. We are certainly not intolerant of other people's beliefs even though we might like to point out that they are in conflict with physical evidence. We do not demonize people who disagree with us. We do not call those who are not with us terrorists. Cheers, Santosh
