TO: George Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In response to Halur Rasho and Philip Thomas you have continued your reprehensible comments about the US Senate's 9/11 Commission not being credible simply because they were "white", without any regard to their individual credentials and political philosophies. This is blatant reverse racism pure and simple.
Your own posts on this subject are ample proof that brown people can be just as biased, irrational and delusional as any white person. You have obviously not even read the 9/11 report, available on www.senate.gov, so how do you come up with your paranoid generalizations? Have you been talking to Michael Moore? While 99.9% of Muslims are not suicidal terrorists, every one of the nineteen 9/11 jihadis were Muslims. In spite of this there are no anti-Muslim or anti-Arab views in the 9/11 report. Every assertion was thoroughly researched and documented and the sources of information are all part of the report. Any honest "brown" person would have come to the same conclusions they did. Regarding the poll you cited you need to know that the US constitution is not responsive to polls, which are a snapshot of the people polled. No more, no less. No country is more protective of the rights of minorities than the US, and "brown skinned" people dominate much of the US economy. For example, Indian Americans have been the top ethnic group by family income since 1980. Filipinos are No. 2. The list includes the whites you are so afraid of. The top two executives in US foreign policy are black skinned, and two cabinet ministers are black as well. The next Attorney General is brown skinned. The top US General in Iraq is an Arab-American. You need to check out how they are treating Muslims in Germany, France and the Netherlands, without the impetus of a 9/11 attack. I have Arab friends in the US who are concerned when Arab strangers show up in their midst. They know the difference between most Muslims and terrorists who happen to be Muslims. Why don't you?