--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The wrath of a woman scorned is only exceeded by the >wrath of a committed left-wing propagandist >confronted with the possibility that global warming >may be modest, >
As stated earlier, I will not address the irrelevant personal insults directed at me by the above netter, other than to mention that these thoughtless remarks and the sexist/misogynic statement made above, once again, reinforces my contention, and that of many of the other netters in this forum, that this man does not care about real facts or science. He has nothing but contemptuous disregard for objective scientific facts and rational conclusions derived from genuine scholarly articles, if they do not conform to his ideology. > >that warming and cooling has happened before >prior to the industrial revolution, and the causes >of global warming may have little to do with human >endeavor and a lot to do with natural causes little >affected by man. > Those who read my last post would realize that the above quote, in particular, directly contradicts the fact-based objective conclusions arrived at in the latest published papers from peer-reviewed mainstream scientific journals such as Reviews of Geophysics and SCIENCE, and the public information resources provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, one of the world's most prestigious bodies dealing with the issue of climate change. It should be clear to all reasonable people who have read my last post on this subject that the above-referenced post fails to address, let alone refute, any of the scientific issues raised by me. Cheers, Santosh