In his essay "Is There a God?” the great Philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote:
“Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of skeptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it; I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.” For hundreds of years there has been a struggle between those who promote reason, tolerance, freedom, and the basic human dignity of the individual on the one side and religious fundamentalists on the other. In a society dominated by religion, the men and women who have tried to promote science, critical thought and the spirit of inquiry and reform have often been branded as the "bad people". They have been labeled as ‘heretics’, ‘enemies of God’ and ‘hate-mongers’. These false accusations are slung by a system whose own fetters of intolerance and bigotry has choked out the freest of nations. The history of religion has been that of conflict, violence, and one atrocity after another, all in the name of ‘God’. Throughout its course, religion has been an impediment to human progress. Unlike a free society which flourishes with the advancement of knowledge, religion always hearkens back to a previous age. It is founded on unchangeable dogma that has been established in a far distant past. Its fixed ideas and ideologies have become the enemy of progress. It is no exaggeration to say that the future progress of human society will be impaired by the continuing influence of superstition, pseudoscience, and religion in public and state affairs. What kind of World do we wish to live in; do we wish to live in a World that builds barriers and promotes violence and hatred in the name of God? Do we wish to live in a World where superstitions and myths continue to play strong roles in the society? Must Religion be allowed to warp a child’s mind from being inquiring, or acquiring a thirst for knowledge? Does freedom of religion mean the freedom to impose religious dogma on society? Does freedom of religion mean the right of religious believers to use public forums, facilities and resources to promote their irrational beliefs? The methods of science are our best tools for learning about the world. We live in an age when science and technology touch every aspect of our lives, so why then must we allow our public lives to be burdened with the trappings of anti-scientific and religious dogma? Science is the thought paradigm which has given humanity the most. The advancement of the human spirit can only occur in a state of freedom and in a society where the mind of man is free from tyrannous control. Only a progressive society can assure that individuals are free to think, believe, and speak as they please. Dr. Santosh Helekar has been a strong protagonist of Science and, through his views and expressions on this forum, has always waged a spirited campaign against quackery, charlatanry and injustice whilst promoting rationalism, social reform, and freedom of thought. The constant evolution of human intelligence can only happen through such scientific inquiry and through consistent application of reason and it is here that Dr Helekar has been doing such a great job. Society must be indebted to individuals like him who consistently devote their time and energies for the greater good of mankind. Science and religion are poles apart and they will always be in conflict with one another. A pro-scientific approach is therefore bound to sound and appear as an anti-religious one. A pro-scientific view will often lead to a war of words and there is therefore no need for Dr Helekar or any progressive- thinking individual to react defensively towards such name-callings and mud-slingings. In conclusion, let me quote Bertrand Russell once again: “Those to whom intellectual freedom is personally important may be a minority in the community, but among them are the men of most importance to the future. We have seen the importance of Copernicus, Galileo, and Darwin in the history of mankind, and it is not to be supposed that the future will produce no more such men. If they are prevented from doing their work and having their due effect, the human race will stagnate, and a new Dark Age will succeed, as the earlier Dark Age succeeded the brilliant period of antiquity. New truth is often uncomfortable, especially to the holders of power; nevertheless, amid the long record of cruelty and bigotry, it is the most important achievement of our intelligent but wayward species.” Cheers Sandeep Heble Panaji-Goa __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/