From: George Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<If you CAREFULLY review my comments with an objective eye, you will note
that I am opposed to
unjust Power Structures which happen to be white in the topics/threads
discussed.>
===
Unfortunately dear Prof, this average Joe is not as brilliant as to Read
"anti-white" "anti-white" "anti-white" from George Pinto ....and NOT to See
Through George's basic racial bias.
If you want ordinary (like moi) human beings to read objectively, I suggest
that you even handedly OPPOSE the Power Structures on principle and
actions, and ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT reference to their skin colour. Leave that
to the Casteists who disciminate against the dalits.
You did the very same thing wrt Bride and Prejudice. And yet, I wonder HOW
many Indian Movies you have seen in the past decade....or two.....or
three.....or four!. Object all you want, to policies and actions - but when
you bring in "colour" .... you are bringing in Colour..... aka Varna in
Sanskrit.
BTW: In the "Pope John Paul v the Hijacked by Marxists ideology Liberation
Theologists in the Latin American govts" , I have yet to hear George
Pinto's viewpoint on WHAT John Paul should have done, and on what basis?
Should he have left them alone?
From Whom would they take their direction ? What if the direction led to
violent actions (unheard of in the political arena ....Right?)
Has George Pinto studied the travails of other Liberation Theologian
politicians (ex priests) and what happened to them ?
Are George Pinto's attacks on John Paul II visavis Liberation Theologian
politicians.....objective?
or are they about some underlying anti-Catholic and anti-European hangup?
jc
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
