Mervyn Lobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        Peter, please tell me if I have understood you properly:
        You do not want to go to the source of the problem to tackle it. 
        Instead, you want to introduce others into this problem?

Mervyn3.0,

You did not understand me properly. I was trying to limit the number of
posts which were responses to Mario's postings, especially those
responses which contained insults against Mario. The ones that carried
insults seemed to form the bulk of responses to Mario's postings
(disclaimer: not based on a scientific study). In all my recommendations
I did not suggest that there be fewer people posting responses to
Mario's posts, all I suggested was that they be compiled into a single
post by somebody who was willing to do it. I'm for no censorship other
than that decided upon by the moderators, whose judgment I respect.

Mervyn3.0 continued:

        Ps. Goanet was an excellent forum for nine and a half years.

I believe you. I am a relative newcomer to this list and continue to
enjoy many of the discussions. I hope I'm not one of those who's
responsible for making you use the past tense in your post script.

Sincerely,

Peter

>Peter D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Here's a suggestion to cut down on some of the posts
>>both from Mario and in response to Mario's posts. 
>>

Reply via email to