<< The skybus technology which seems to have been talked about for a long time
really sounds too good to be true. It is most unfortunate that they went and
goofed up fatally in a relatively simple matter like testing -- not just
once, but twice! As a result they could not go to the next stage of
developing a live demonstration project in conjunction with the Goa govt a
big backer of the system. So they have nothing to show anyone by way of a
functioning skybus system. Hence no customers for it. Very sad. >> Philip T


Seems more like a case of *Give a dog a bad name and hang him*?  When/what was
the *second* goof-up?  If I recall correctly, the *Parrikar* government fell
before the demonstration project could be completed.

Appended below is a copy of the *official* accident report.

Lawrence
-----

See http://www.sky-bus-metro.com/download/skybus_accident_report.pdf

SKY BUS ACCIDENT ON 25th SEPTEMBER
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND WAY FORWARD
21-12-2004

I have gone through the report.

The cause is identified as severe skidding of the sky bus system - but on rail
no ‘skid
marks’ are observed. The marks that are mentioned here are what we normally
observe in
Railways, when wheel is jammed and ‘skid marks’ appear in longitudinal direction
on rail top
in dry conditions. In this case, the thin film lubrication of water and grease
has caused lateral
skidding forces to swerve, occur as it happens on a road with oil and water
mixture, would
cause a truck to swerve when steering is turned. Severe rotational forces occur
turning the
trucks even by 180°. The Sky Bus too in this case seems to have swerved /skidded
as it tried
to change direction on the entry of curve – with the presence of water and
grease on top of
rail.

By Physics, the coach should not have hit the column, even at the speed of 50
kmph
because by design enough clearances are provided for centrifugal action.

But the coach has hit. Hence we do not have any other explanation other than,
what
has been brought out.

Similarly, evidence points to pushing of grease in longitude direction, in the
direction
of motion, which the Committee while recording evidence felt, could be because
of
application of brakes. But again this is in contradiction to evidence that the
brake blocks
were found in released condition and did not apply. The explanation, again can
be that the
skidding and swerving action of the bogies could have caused the movement of
grease too.

In the first run of normal mode, there was no problem with grease etc. But why
in the
second run the swerving/ skid occurred ?

It is a matter of fact that there was no drizzle in the first run. In the second
run drizzle
caused addition of water to grease. Also in manual run, as man perceives, the
speed control
was exercised much earlier and electrical braking was continuously available.
Perhaps with
same electrical braking available in second run, the speed could have been
controlled by the
time curve was reached.

It is a matter of concern that grease has appeared on rail top, inspite of the
entire rail
top having been cleaned up 10 days earlier. All concerned staff have denied
doing any thing
to do with presence of the grease.

Way Forward :

·  Mechanical Brakes :
Failure of mechanical brakes is a serious concern. With primary dependence on
very
superior electrical regenerative braking, the mechanical braking, got a short
shrift in checking
and making sure of the same.

We shall provide a totally independent mechanical brake with parallel and
independent controls and redundancy too.

·  Manual emergency stop in Auto-mode :
In Automated systems, the manual intervention can queer the pitch – Had the
operation of emergency button to abort experiment been delayed by a few seconds,
the
electrical braking system would have automatically taken over and covered the
error of 50 m.
in distance measurement which occurred due to slip of wheels. 150 m. extra
distance is
available to cover this type of mistake in distance measurement. However, error
of
judgement can occur when panic may occur. Design of emergency switch should be
such
that, instead of cutting off power in one go, a 5 second delayed action should
be planned (as
done in Reactor Management) during which period, emergency electrical braking
should be
applied and then only follow with the mechanical braking.

·  Curvature & grease:
For commercial implementation, we shall avoid the curvature of 100 m., even
though
permissible, where one needs greasing the rail gauge face. Sky Bus can as well
avail of 20
m. radius of turning, by using its traverser. Hence, we shall not adopt
curvatures of track
sharper than 250 m. But in cities we have flexibility to adopt even 20 m. radius
curvature
using traverser.

·  Auto-mode:
For implementing the commercial automatic mode, the due processes of checking
through ‘CENELEC Standards and certification will be necessary and one should
avoid
manual interventions when automode is in operation. Through the same automode,
the
emergency procedure has to be implemented using electrical braking first, then
use the
mechanical brakes.

Security – Commercially sensitive project :
Security in the area has been now tightened and in commercially sensitive
project
entry and exit has to be strictly controlled.

Positive points which emerged in this unfortunate accident
·  It is important to note that inspite of such impact forces, the people inside
the coach
were not crushed to death due to coach collapsing / capsizing. They survived the
crash.
·  The suspenders did not fail, only got bent, but held positively the coach
suspended,
and so did not fall down on to the ground. This is as per our expectations.
·  The wheels did not derail but remained on track which is a positive point and
again
design has proven right.
·  So unlike in a conventional railway system, Sky Bus proved to be safer in
disaster.

In summary before restart the following is to be ensured :
1. The mechanical braking systems provided with additional redundancy.
2. First electrical braking takes place before any emergency mechanical brakes
are
applied for control.
3. Only manual mode running to be implemented, while the auto-driving devices
are
in background, effective to implement braking rather than drive, acting as ACD –
an additional safety lever.
4. Signalled train control system to be used in the first phase trials and will
graduate
to driverless system over six months – which is as per original plans.
5. Our goal is to make Sky Bus fit to be certified like a normal rail line, with
signal
interlocking standards prevailing on Indian Railway for public carriage of
passengers and similar to existing suburban Railways.

B. Rajaram
Managing Director/KRCL
& Accepting Authority


Reply via email to