Cornel, > I think it is you who seems to wear a kashtie that is a little too tight, my friend. > What does WW-II have to do with this thread? > Did you really expect me to accept without rebuttal or answer your comment, however innocent or naive, that the Catholic Church was being secretive about convert married priests, when there is no evidence that they have done so? > Did you really expect me to research the Goanet archives to determine whether what you were saying right now was in conformity with what you had said previously? > Besides your general complaint, do you have any specific comment about what I said?
--- cornel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mario trips a bit too easily! A seemingly innocent > question often > encourages and begets more responses than a bullish > "know it all approach." > Indeed the self same Mario had expressed, at least > once on Goanet that, he > reckoned I had feigned ignorance about some aspects > of WW2 to draw things > out of him! He was right then of course, but this > did not stop him from > delivering long lecture notes willy nilly. > > The Goanet archives will illustrate some points I > had made previously about > the reality of married priests among Catholics in > South and North America > and elsewhere. >
