India: Nobody's Children - Child Labour and the Apathy of the State
[Editorial]


The revelation of the national convenor of the advocacy unit of the Campaign
Against Child Labour has been really shocking: Goa, a state having a high
index of literacy, has the highest number of domestic child labourers. And
what is more, the statistics is five years' old. It was collected by the
National Family Health Survey in 1998-99. The CACL says according to their
estimates there has been a substantial increase in the percentage of child
labourers as domestics since the size of the educated and urban middle class
has increased. It is really a paradox that the middle classes, which have
been most vocal in their portrayal of non-governance in every walk of life
and always raised their voice for rule of law, have been averse to obeying
the laws and human conscience and protecting the rights of the children.
What has been most pathetic is the passive attitude of the government
agencies in putting a stop to this practice. However it is not that
government of Goa is the lone culprit; almost all the governments have been
least bothered about the problem of child labour. The government of India
along with the state governments has signed the United Nations International
Covenant on Children's Rights, but unfortunately they have not pursued any
measure to make the covenant a reality. For some years the debate has been
going on for creation of a National Children's Commission. Some of the state
governments have their own child labour commissions but almost all are on
paper: either a senior bureaucrat heads the commission or a group of
ministers look after its work, and in either case the result is negative.
The reports of violations of human rights, abuses which include kidnapping,
rape, murder, torture are not being paid proper attention.
The death of a migrant child in Margao in the first week of April and the
apathy of the government to deliver justice to the dead child is still fresh
in public memory. The authorities are yet to initiate any measure to
ameliorate the child labourers' conditions, since they are nobody's
children. Acknowledging the rights of the children as sacrosanct by the
authorities and the rulers has simply turned out to be a ritual and a ploy
of populism; real concern is missing. There is no doubt that violation of
children's rights has been on increase in Goa or other states. And this has
got a psychological dimension. The common attitude, particularly of the
middle class, toward these children has been of exploitation. As long as
they get them for their domestic work they are least concerned about
anything else. Most Goans see it not as their problem but as a problem of
the poor inside or outside the state and would not like to be blamed for the
plight of these children.

Fifteen years ago, the UN General Assembly had adopted a resolution on the
Rights of Child which, besides prohibiting child labour, laid down that
every attempt be made to protect the child labour at work and also attack
the basic cause of child labour. Unfortunately no move has been initiated in
the direction of analysing the roots of the problem and finding the
solution. A CACL study points out that the agrarian jobs not proving to be
more effective, there is a gradual shift of the child from the agrarian
sector to manufacturing or service sector. Though the official statistics
shows a reduction in the child labour, the number of these children has
multiplied by 60 per cent in some states. And this has been happening when
India joined the rest of the nations of the SAARC region in setting a
deadline (year 2000!) for the eradication of child labour in hazardous
occupations and all child labour by 2010.

The government of India has set up a high-powered body, the National
Authority for Elimination of Child Labour for laying down policies and
programmes for elimination of child labour. But what has been most amazing
is the abnormal rise in the child labour. Despite a number of laws made
curbing it, the system is getting stronger. It is obvious that the
government and the political leadership is not too keen to eliminate it.
Otherwise there is no reason why the government should have preferred to
ignore the demand of the children's rights groups for a comprehensive code
bill. If the government is really serious to eradicate child labour, it
should immediately come out with a comprehensive education bill with focus
on equity and formal nature of schooling. The authorities must take strong
measures to reduce the number of children employed as domestics in middle
class homes as well as in other sectors, like hotels and
restaurants.[Source: The Navhind Times]
Posted on 2004-06-24
Back to [ACR Weekly Newsletter Vol. 3, No. 25 (23 June 2004)]
remarks:2

http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=navhind+times+editorial+child+labour&;
btnG=Google+Search&meta=
Asian Human Rights Commission
COMMENTS:

Of hand the above editorial seems to be a handiwork of a sensitive person
who actually detests child labour. And this editorial comes from an erudite
person, none other than Mr. Arun Sinha, editor of Navhind Times, a Dempo
Publication. The editorial makes a special note of children employed as
domestics in middle class homes as well as in other sectors like hotels and
restaurants.

Constrast the above with the prominent news item in today's newspapers. I
would like to abstract the news item of the Gomantak Times (14/10/05). The
same news item given in Navhind Times lacks substance for obvious reasons.
And surprisingly, Herald has given a complete go by to this particular hot
news item.

GT: Molestation case against journalist.
Panaji: In a shocking incident, a minor girl lodged a police complaint
against a senior journalist of the local daily. The minor girl, who was
employed by the journalist as a household help, in her complaint alleged
that the journalist molested her. The case, which was first registered by
the Women and Child Protection police station was then transferred to the
CID/Crime branch for investigations. A non-bailable offence under Sec 8(2) (
for sexual abuse) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 and bailable offence under Sec
354 (for  molestation)  under IPC and Sec 7(5)(c) (for child labour) has
been booked against the journalist. It is reliably learnt that in her
complaint the 11-year-old minor alleged that the journalist tried to molest
her. According to police sources, the minor girl rushed out of the flat on
Wednesday night and went to a neighbouring house. The occupants then took
her to another neighbour. Both the neighbours referred the matter to the
women and child protection unit. In fact it is learnt that an editor of a
newly launched vernacular newspaper was the first to inform the police of
the incident. The police officers including Deputy Inspector General of
Police (DIG) Ujjwal Mishra interrogated the victim in the presence of some
women activists. When GT contacted CRG, which fights for Child's Rights in
Goa, maintained a stoic silence, refusing to comment on the issue. When GT
persisted, all they said was, "we will comment at the right time." However,
Bailancho Saad members said that they were ignorant about the incident.
Meanwhile, it is learnt that the journalist has already filed an
anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, Panaji and the
hearing has been fixed for Friday 14 October at 2.30 p.m.  (end)
The above edit no doubt originates from Mr. Arun Sinha, the editor of long
standing with the Navhind Times. I have particularly admired his editorials
and many a times I have sent congratulatory via emails to him. However he
has not been kind to either me or the Goa Su-Raj Party. This is because I
had called him a "dog on his master's leash" when he had written a very
derogatory editorial about Goans during the Anti-Metastrips agitation,  when
a police constable was killed in a skirmish with agitators at Goa Velha.
Since then, Mr. Arun Sinha has prefered to call the Party  "Bloody Goa
Su-Raj Party".

The senior journalist in question in the above news item is none other than
Mr. Arun Sinha. There is a saying in Konkani "Mazor Xhapottam Sangta ani
Pollan Agta" (The cat wisecracks but relieves itself in the fire-place).
Arun Sinha has been talking about the sickness of child labour in his edit
and suggests that the culprits must be punished. I only hope that the court
has not given him  bail.  He must be incarcerated in a dingy cell so that he
can weep for his doings, when he is the person who was preaching to the
people of Goa from the powerful Dempo pulpit. The cops at Dona Paula did
find the behaviour of Mr. Arun Sinha ironical especially in the light of his
writing about child labour in his recent editorial. However, I had missed it
and worst still I couldn't lay my hands on it from my collection of Navhind
Times. Therefore I got the above through Google search. I wonder if it is
the same edit in question. Nevertheless, it shows how the man thought and
how he behaved. It will be very difficult for us Goans to trust these
non-goan loudmouths any more. They may have learnt well. But they must learn
to practice what they preach.
goasuraj


Reply via email to