--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         Wishing all Goanetters                         |
|                             a Prosperous                               |
|                                  and                                   |
|                         Happy New Year - 2006                          |
|                    Goanet - http://www.goanet.org                      |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.fightingmalaria.org/research.php?ID=41
>
It is interesting that the vociferous extreme
environmentalists on Goanet, bent on forcing mandatory
climate controls down our throats based on
questionable evidence, while curiously exempting India
and China, had nothing to say about my post on the
deadly wastage of DDT in malaria-ridden Bihar.
>
It was junk science by the extreme environmentalists
that banned the use of DDT in western countries and
still discourages the use of DDT leading to millions
of deaths in mainly poor and tropical countries.
>
The following excerpt is from the link above, Written
Testimony of Roger Bate and Richard Tren to the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on the
role of science in environmental policy making,
Wednesday 28th September, 2005, Room 406 of the
Dirksen Senate Office Building.:
>
"DDT helped eradicate malaria from Europe and the
United States in the 1950s, and was used to eradicate
malaria in many other countries in the following two
decades. It is still used widely in at least a dozen
countries (perhaps as many as two dozen), but these
countries have been discouraged by virtually all
United Nations organizations, donor agencies and
commercial interests.

DDT is safe for human use and there has never been a
peer-reviewed replicated study showing any human harm
from the chemical, even though billions have been
exposed to it (hundreds of millions in moderate to
high doses). Its bioaccumulation and persistence in
the environment have caused far less harm than is
commonly believed. But small problems did occur when
massive amounts were used in farming, and today, quite
correctly, it is used solely in disease control where
tiny amounts are used. But some environmental groups
continue to conflate tiny vital use in disease control
with massive and potentially dangerous use in
agriculture. These groups have sustained pressure
against its use for over three decades with disastrous
results."
(end of excerpt)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    Goa - 2005 Santosh Trophy Champions                 |
|                                                                        |
|      Support Soccer Activities at the grassroots in our villages       |
|  Vacationing in Goa this year-end - Carry and distribute Soccer Balls  |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to