REQUEST TO GRANT PERMISSION TO CELEBRATE FEASTS AT ANJEDIVA ISLAND IN GOA

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK (GOA):  Sir, there is an island, which is a part of 
the State of Goa, situated in the village Anjediva Island, Canacona Taluka, 
comprising an area of 34,0075, sq. meters, surveyed under number 1,2 and 3 of 
village Anjediva.  

       This Island was transferred to the Union of India by the Government of 
Goa under the provisions of Goa Land Revenue Code 1968, for the purpose of 
Project Sea Bird, constructed at Karwar in Karnataka.  

       In this Island, there is a Church, Nossa Senhora de Brotas (Our Lady of 
Springs) built in 1506 and rebuilt in 1682 and subsequently in 1729.  It is 
the first Church built by the Portuguese in India, 158 years before the Taj 
Mahal.  In this Island, two feasts are celebrated every year.  One feast, on 
2nd February, namely, of Our Lady of Springs, and another on 4th February, at 
the Chapel of St. Francis de Assiss.

       However, despite commitments made by the Indian Navy, devotees are not 
allowed to celebrate these two feasts.  The Church and the Chapel existing on 
the Island are not maintained properly. 

       It is well known that even national high security zones are opened to 
the public, as a goodwill measure, on occasions like Navy Week, etc.  The 
Project Seabird at Karwar has been no exception, having opened its portals to 
all and sundry during the Navy Week for the last three years.  Peaceful 
celebration of two traditional feasts could also be handled, without great 
hassle, by the concerned authorities.  In doing so, needless to say, you would 
be honouring the legitimate sentiments of the peaceful Catholic population of 
Goa.  Archbishop of Goa and Daman has also written to the Indian Navy on 
similar lines.  

       The Defence Ministry, therefore, should direct the Indian Navy to allow 
celebration of the two feasts and to carry the maintenance of the Church and 
the Chapel there.                               (Ends)


SOURCE: http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsdebate/deb_ndx/207/01032006/5to6.htm

Reply via email to