--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is quite amusing to witness this twisting and
> turning to maintain that the morality of organized
> religions such as Communistic Atheism, the Hindutva
> religion and the religions of bush and ahmadinejad,
> is
> better than that of unorganized religions such as
> the
> folk religions of India, and the individualism and
> rationalism of religious and non-religious folk.
>
Mario observes:
>
The above assertion by Santosh is false.
>
Santosh is far from amused when he begins to resort to
his relentless obfuscations and misrepresentations of
what someone else has said, as he has tried once again
in his comments above.
>
The point that has been made by me is that organized
religions provide their followers with some universal
moral compass. Disorganized atheists have to devise
moral compasses of their own which can be whatever
they want it to be. I have repeatedly said that these
can be better or not than those provided by organized
religions. I have also said that having a moral
compass is no guarantee of anything. Know this when
you read his comments above, which are plainly false
in the proper context.
>
