Aires Rodrigues wrote:
1: Parliament was firm in expelling the 11 MPs involved in the cash for
questions scam.
2: spinelessly dealing with the other batch of 7 MPs caught negotiating cuts
in the MPLAD scheme.
3: This offence is in fact much more serious a
4: It is accepted that the Goa MP was not caught in the act of accepting
money
5: he was filmed negotiating a cut of the MPLAD pie
6: serious enough not only to expel him from Parliament but to initiate
criminal charges and prosecute him in accordance with law.
jc's queries
May I ask Aires the following
1: Was Churchill put on oath and allowed to testify for himself?
2: Was he allowed to confront his accusers?
3: What do the Indian rules of evidence have to say about entrapment?
4: On what basis is this alleged offence worse than that of the 11 expelled
MPs
just curious
jc
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
