--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One can even make up one's own definition of > fundamentalism. Mainstream moderate convictions can > be portrayed as extremist ones by simply redefining > them according to one's own idiosyncratic tastes. > Mario observes: > Santosh gives us a clue as to how he composes his posts when he says, "Mainstream moderate convictions can be portrayed as extremist ones by simply redefining them according to one's own idiosyncratic tastes." What a telling admission. > This is precisely what we saw when he took the illegal actions of fringe groups like Jain nudists and Mormon polygamists, and long abolished social atrocities like one deranged woman's "sati", as well as "allegations" of wrongdoing by Sai Baba, and tried to use these examples to claim that ALL religious moral codes were "fake". > --- Radhakrishnan Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMHO, Santosh can be accused of 'scientism' > (excessive faith in the power of science), but he's > definitely not guilty of many other misdeeds that > Mario and Chris Vaz accuse him of. > Mario asks: > RKN, rather than make such a sweeping, snide and unsubstantiated accusation, would it be possible for you to be a little more specific about the "misdeeds" that Santosh is "definitely not guilty of", so that Chris and I can respond to your scurrilous allegations? > I will let Chris speak for himself, but I am not aware of accusing Santosh of any "misdeeds" that he is "definitely" not guilty of. > Thank you. >
_______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list Goanet@lists.goanet.org http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
