------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G * O * A * N * E * T **** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
There is no better, value for money, guest house.
Confirm your bookings early or miss-out
Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Mario,
>
> It is not the homosexual male per se that is given
> to promiscuous behaviour. It is the male gender,
> which is designed biologically to engage in
> promiscuous sexual activity.
>
Mario observes:
>
Selma,
Once again I have to disagree with the facts behind
your comments.
>
While males may be more psychologically polygamous by
nature, all males are hardly more "promicuous"
biologically. If they were there would be no such
thing as ED and the little blue pill. Isn't it the
female gender that is biologically designed to have
sex without any prior physical reaction?
>
There are few heterosexual males who engage in the
wholesale and often anonymous promiscuity that
homosexual males are known to engage in, by their own
admission.
>
The vast majority of the homosexual community prefer
the uncommitted version with no responsibility. As I
have said before, we now see more of them in committed
relationships, but the growth and visibility of such
relationships is a fairly recent phenomenon, I believe
mostly out of necessity.
>
Selma writes:
>
> The heterosexual male balances his need to raise
> children in a stable environment under the influence
> of one partner, against his desire to be
> indiscriminately promiscuous.
>
Mario observes:
>
Very few do. Most don't.
>
Selma writes:
>
> Neither the homosexual nor the heterosexual male can
> claim moral superiority over the other. With the
> possibility of being able to raise children either
> through adoption, or with the aid of artificial
> insemination, homosexual males are now faced with
> the prospect of monotony er I mean monogamy :))
>
Mario adds:
>
This is an issue of facts and societal evolution, not
of any claims of moral superiority. The growth of
homosexual monotony is a good thing. The monotonous
ones are the mature and sensible ones, who also
realize the risks of promiscuity in this day and age.
However, they are still few and far between.
>
None of this has anything to do with the opposition to
the use of the very clearly defined term "marriage"
for committed homosexual relationships.
>
_______________________________________________
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
