Dear Dr. Ferdinando, I am not an expert on this field. BUT, I do not trust local engineers, technicians and quality of the machines.
I am a cautious person. I do not make pronouncements based of the statements of others... in another country with different sets of individuals and machines. Hence, I thought that the pronouncement from Dr. Shekhar Salkar was unwise, especially as he is not a research scientist. It was a counterproductive statement which appeared to be 'matlabi' in nature, even though they may not have been. BTW: I also do NOT 'carte blanche' accept the pronouncements (on this topic) of Girish Kumar. best j On 14 September 2016 at 20:20, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão < drferdina...@hotmail.com> wrote: > With these latest facts from accepted scientific research bodies, I ask > the following questions. Can a qualified Doctor in the medical field assure > with confidence that cancer cannot be caused when authorities have not > proved it yet? Is there a constant check by any Authority on the levels of > RF energy emissions from the towers? Is there anyway of checking the > radiation level of the mobile phone? Regulatory information gives out > Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of the head and body. For the head, SAR of > more than 1.6 is dangerous. Anything below 1 is safe. For the body, SAR > above 5 is dangerous and regulatory norms prescribe that SAR has to be less > than 2 for the body.