From: Rohit Parakh <rohit.26
Date: Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:04 PM
We have long been told a compelling story about the relationship between rich
countries and poor countries. The story holds that the rich nations of the OECD
give generously of their wealth to the poorer nations of the global south, to
help them eradicate poverty and push them up the development ladder. Yes,
during colonialism western powers may have enriched themselves by extracting
resources and slave labour from their colonies – but that’s all in the past.
These days, they give more than $125bn (£102bn) in aid each year – solid
evidence of their benevolent goodwill.
This story is so widely propagated by the aid industry and the governments of
the rich world that we have come to take it for granted. But it may not be as
simple as it appears.
The US-based Global Financial Integrity (GFI) and the Centre for Applied
Research at the Norwegian School of Economics recently published some
fascinating data. They tallied up all of the financial resources that get
transferred between rich countries and poor countries each year: not just aid,
foreign investment and trade flows (as previous studies have done) but also
non-financial transfers such as debt cancellation, unrequited transfers like
workers’ remittances, and unrecorded capital flight (more of this later). As
far as I am aware, it is the most comprehensive assessment of resource
transfers ever undertaken.
The flow of money from rich countries to poor countries pales in comparison to
the flow that runs in the other direction
What they discovered is that the flow of money from rich countries to poor
countries pales in comparison to the flow that runs in the other direction.
In 2012, the last year of recorded data, developing countries received a total
of $1.3tn, including all aid, investment, and income from abroad. But that same
year some $3.3tn flowed out of them. In other words, developing countries sent
$2tn more to the rest of the world than they received. If we look at all years
since 1980, these net outflows add up to an eye-popping total of $16.3tn –
that’s how much money has been drained out of the global south over the past
few decades. To get a sense for the scale of this, $16.3tn is roughly the GDP
of the United States
What this means is that the usual development narrative has it backwards. Aid
is effectively flowing in reverse. Rich countries aren’t developing poor
countries; poor countries are developing rich ones.
It's not aid in reverse, illicit financial flows are more complicated than that
Maya Forstater Read more
What do these large outflows consist of? Well, some of it is payments on debt.
Developing countries have forked out over $4.2tn in interest payments alone
since 1980 – a direct cash transfer to big banks in New York and London, on a
scale that dwarfs the aid that they received during the same period. Another
big contributor is the income that foreigners make on their investments in
developing countries and then repatriate back home. Think of all the profits
that BP extracts from Nigeria’s oil reserves, for example, or that
Anglo-American pulls out of South Africa’s gold mines.
But by far the biggest chunk of outflows has to do with unrecorded – and
usually illicit – capital flight. GFI calculates that developing countries have
lost a total of $13.4tn through unrecorded capital flight since 1980.
Most of these unrecorded outflows take place through the international trade
system. Basically, corporations – foreign and domestic alike – report false
prices on their trade invoices in order to spirit money out of developing
countries directly into tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions, a practice known
as “trade misinvoicing”. Usually the goal is to evade taxes, but sometimes this
practice is used to launder money or circumvent capital controls. In 2012,
developing countries lost $700bn through trade misinvoicing, which outstripped
aid receipts that year by a factor of five.
Multinational companies also steal money from developing countries through
“same-invoice faking”, shifting profits illegally between their own
subsidiaries by mutually faking trade invoice prices on both sides. For
example, a subsidiary in Nigeria might dodge local taxes by shifting money to a
related subsidiary in the British Virgin Islands, where the tax rate is
effectively zero and where stolen funds can’t be traced.
GFI doesn’t include same-invoice faking in its headline figures because it is
very difficult to detect, but they estimate that it amounts to another $700bn
per year. And these figures only cover theft through trade in goods. If we add
theft through trade in services to the mix, it brings total net resource
outflows to about $3tn per year.
That’s 24 times more than the aid budget. In other words, for every $1 of aid
that developing countries receive, they lose $24 in net outflows. These
outflows strip developing countries of an important source of revenue and
finance for development. The GFI report finds that increasingly large net
outflows have caused economic growth rates in developing countries to decline,
and are directly responsible for falling living standards.
Who is to blame for this disaster? Since illegal capital flight is such a big
chunk of the problem, that’s a good place to start.. Companies that lie on
their trade invoices are clearly at fault; but why is it so easy for them to
get away with it? In the past, customs officials could hold up transactions
that looked dodgy, making it nearly impossible for anyone to cheat. But the
World Trade Organisation claimed that this made trade inefficient, and since
1994 customs officials have been required to accept invoiced prices at face
value except in very suspicious circumstances, making it difficult for them to
seize illicit outflows.
Still, illegal capital flight wouldn’t be possible without the tax havens. And
when it comes to tax havens, the culprits are not hard to identify: there are
more than 60 in the world, and the vast majority of them are controlled by a
handful of western countries. There are European tax havens such as Luxembourg
and Belgium, and US tax havens like Delaware and Manhattan. But by far the
biggest network of tax havens is centered around the City of London, which
controls secrecy jurisdictions throughout the British Crown Dependencies and
Overseas Territories.
In other words, some of the very countries that so love to tout their foreign
aid contributions are the ones enabling mass theft from developing countries..
The aid narrative begins to seem a bit naïve when we take these reverse flows
into account. It becomes clear that aid does little but mask the
maldistribution of resources around the world. It makes the takers seem like
givers, granting them a kind of moral high ground while preventing those of us
who care about global poverty from understanding how the system really works.
Poor countries don’t need charity. They need justice. And justice is not
difficult to deliver. We could write off the excess debts of poor countries,
freeing them up to spend their money on development instead of interest
payments on old loans; we could close down the secrecy jurisdictions, and slap
penalties on bankers and accountants who facilitate illicit outflows; and we
could impose a global minimum tax on corporate income to eliminate the
incentive for corporations to secretly shift their money around the world.
We know how to fix the problem. But doing so would run up against the interests
of powerful banks and corporations that extract significant material benefit
from the existing system. The question is, do we have the courage?
--
marie
406/1 grande coimavaddoaldona, bardezgoa 403508tel 0832-2293034mob: 9921875544
__._,_.___ Posted by: marie <dsouza.ma...@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • |
Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app? With 4.5 stars in iTunes,
the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you
waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more)
in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
Visit Your Group
• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___
