Dhirios Banned Under Cruelty to Animals Dhirios, the traditional bullfights of Goa, have been banned under provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Yet, several inconsistencies and contradictions arise when comparing this ban to other practices.
For instance, the slaughter of livestock for human consumption is legal and does not fall under these cruelty provisions. Likewise, boxing—where fatalities and serious injuries are not uncommon—is viewed as a legitimate sport, not savagery. Cockfights, still prevalent in parts of South India and often resulting in the death of birds, are rarely scrutinized under the same lens of animal cruelty. In Goa, Dhirios are not held in controlled arenas, posing significant risks to spectators. Comparatively, bullfights in Italy—equally dangerous and rooted in tradition—continue without bans. Clearly, the concept of cruelty is interpreted differently across regions and cultures. In Goa, Dhirios are primarily driven by betting and high stakes. Owners invest heavily in the year-round upkeep of bulls or buffaloes, driven by passion rather than profit. Despite the expenses, sponsorship is rare. Even former Chief Ministers and political candidates have attempted to revive Dhirios to appeal to voters, disregarding legal implications—unsuccessfully. The current debate must first confront the legal challenges and prioritize safety, including the establishment of secure arenas. Dhirios are not a sport in the traditional sense; they attract crowds not for athletic admiration, but largely for gambling. Nelson lopes Chinchinim . Nelson Lopes Chinchinim https://lopesnelsonnat.wordpress.com
