By: Kalpita Bhar Paul and Aveek Mondal
Published in: *The Wire*
Date: December 20, 2025
Source:
https://thewire.in/religion/everything-santa-claus-has-come-to-mean-for-indians

*Christmas Eve.* Nine‑year‑old Rohan slipped his wish‑list under his pillow
and went to bed. Perhaps his dreams that night were filled with thoughts of
Santa Claus – the red-suited, white-bearded figure flying over rooftops,
ready to bring joy. His parents gently retrieve the list, smiling with
anticipation, filling a large decorative stocking with as many gifts as
they can, along with a heartfelt letter from Santa, praising Rohan’s hard
work and cheering for his well-earned presents.

Each Christmas Eve, like Rohan, an estimated 5 crore children in India
place their hopes and dreams in the hands of Santa Claus. It has become a
phenomenon beyond any religious boundary.
But who is Santa?

The global figure originates from Saint Nicholas, a 3rd-century Christian
bishop from Patara in modern-day Turkey. Nicholas is known for miraculously
saving sailors and providing dowries to rescue destituted children. His
anonymous generosity made him the patron saint of children and sailors. His
legacy of secret gift‑giving forms the hagiographic foundation of modern
Santa Claus.

Though Santa was revered in various forms in Europe, he could step out of
Europe only in the late eighteenth century. In 1773, three years before
American independence, he set foot in New York
<https://www.nypl.org/blog/2015/12/09/santas-new-york-roots> through a
newspaper article. From the 1820s onward, American papers began featuring
Santa. By the 1840s, Santa appeared in shopping displays across New York.
Yet it took another fifty years before he became the Christmas sensation
with the iconic image of Santa Claus established by Thomas Nast
<https://archive.org/details/gri_33125008808467/page/n7/mode/2up> where he
added some key elements to Santa’s story – his North Pole home, a team of
toy-building elves, and his role as an overseer of childhood morality.

By 1890, the Salvation Army was sending unemployed men dressed as Santa to
collect donations. Gradually, the Santa Claus myth became inseparable from
the festive spirit of the modern Christmas.
Santa in Postcolonial Context: Mimicry and Meaning

Much like post-revolution America, India emerged from its colonial past as
a mosaic of identities, languages, and cultures. However, independence is
coupled with a project of nation‑building, which always demands a uniform
narrative, a singular image of citizenship that can hold a diverse
population together.

This impulse to create a cohesive national identity has gradually distanced
us from the very diversity it sought to unify. Postcolonial theorist Homi
Bhabha highlights in *The Location of Culture* (1994) that we drift toward
globalisation by mimicking a global identity that presents itself in
metonymy – or symbolic shorthand. We alienate ourselves to align with that
uniform culture – a process that symbolises modernisation, but without
dissolving our otherness. The effects of this mimicry are incorporated into
our socio-cultural psyche. It eventually reaches the child’s psyche.

The direct effects of this cultural mimicry can be seen in our education
system as well as workplaces. Children are taught to conform and seek
rewards. Learning is measured through obedience and performance. If one is
not at par with the global standard, a survival crisis manifests. Slowly,
we learn that self‑gratification and enjoyment are insufficient. As a
post-colonial society our aspiration of being modernised was modulated and
sanctioned by the set global standard. Our work more than self‑enjoyment
becomes products to be evaluated in the global market.

Through this practice of self‑alienation, humans become human resources,
useful only for delivering labour to secure subsistence. Thus, in the
postcolonial era, global superpowers continue to colonise our thoughts,
imagination and labour.

At a broader level, the act of writing a wish-list aligns with global
consumerist psychology. In American public consciousness, the modern Santa
is a merchandised evolution of the benevolent saint. But the imagery of
Santa that signifies the capitalist-consumerist culture is also infused
with many similar characters across Christian cultures: Kris Kringle
rewarding well‑behaved Swiss and German children; Jultomten, a jolly elf in
Scandinavia; Père Noël in France and La Befana, a kindly witch from Italy.
They all serve the same jingoistic purpose – acting as a superior being.

Following this trajectory, in India, apart from symbolising
capitalist-consumerism, Santa captures the effects of mimicry in cultural
psychology of a post-colonised India. This is where Santa becomes
psychologically relevant in Indian society. Santa – an approver, a symbolic
evaluator of one’s behaviour. Children submit wish-lists not merely to
request toys, but as early participants in a system of conditional
gratification.

In adulthood the belief in Santa fades, but the psychological conditioning
that hankers after appreciation and expects to be rewarded for deeds
remains forever. We hesitate to pursue joy for its own sake. This
transformation reflects a deeper alienation – of pleasure becoming
something to be earned, not simply felt.

The vacuum of everyday enjoyment transforms into either a wish‑list or, at
times, takes the form of a delayed gratification.

Yet, beyond this formation of Santa as sanctioner, we could trace an
ecological root of Santa that, perhaps, would help us to make sense of
today’s imagination of Santa as the gift giver. In Nordic culture, nomadic
peoples living uphill would descend with their reindeers during the extreme
winter and exchange various necessities (leather, meat, dairy) with people
downhill.

Both parties awaited the year‑round meeting when they could trade items.
This exchange was a survival mechanism; once a way to transcend ecological
limits and offer resources, now a means to transcend our alienation and
provide socio-psychological stability. Thus the metaphor of a tribal
culture is ingested by power and transformed into the metonymy of its
hegemony.

Beneath the commercial wrapping lies a deeper metaphor: a moment of
reciprocity and of bridging gaps in resources and reconnecting isolated
lives. In contemporary India, especially among the economically deprived,
Santa’s promise allows families to cope with consumerism without
participation. The ritual of delayed gratification becomes a form of
psychological resistance. Year after year, they wait for the time to
receive the gracious gift from Santa. They wait for the approval of their
hard work and show the rest of the world the benevolence of time. It
creates hope, allows space for patience and lets people without means to
indulge in dreaming.

This highlights a subtle but powerful cultural adaptation. Unlike the West,
where Santa’s accounting resets annually based on deeds, in India, reward
cycles are influenced by a longer karmic vision that span lifetimes.
Perhaps for this reason, even though they wait for the approval of their
hard work, they don’t lose heart. It, instead, shows the ‘otherness’
embedded in the mimicking. Thus on the night of December 24, Christmas eve,
millions of Indians without any expectation of fulfilling their wishlist,
welcome the guest Santa Claus with a smiling face.

The image of Santa is imported in India, but the meanings associated with
him are rooted in Indian philosophy, resilience and imagination. He carries
within him the otherness of mimicry. As Jorge Luis Borges has shown in his
fiction, mimicries and fantasies become real and acquire a life of their
own.

Perhaps someday, on a Christmas Eve, our children will welcome Santa Claus
in a dialogic space, ignoring his patriotic superiority, get to know him
better. Instead of a wish‑list, a child might tuck a note beneath their
pillow that simply says, “Hi Santa, How are you?” beginning the
conversation on an equal plane. This small gesture signifies the true power
of cultural mimicry – not in blindly copying, but in reshaping, adapting
and, finally, humanising even the grandest of myths.

*Dr Kalpita Bhar Paul is an Assistant Professor at the School of Liberal
Studies, **BML Munjal University, Gurugram. Aveek Mondal is a researcher
and thinker.*

Reply via email to