Sonia don't get dishearten …….. Sonia you are wasting your time in posing questions to Kavin like "Why no response in defense or otherwise on Dighambar Kamat? Sonia, as far as Goanet is concerned you got the theory of religion right but not that of political party belief!
It's not Kavin alone but it's Goanet in majority is full with one party belief and that's Congress Party. Come what may they will defend, protest, and do all sort of mischief only to promote Congress Party and their candidate. For them even if Donkey takes over as CM of Goa and sells Goa its okay provided that Donkey belongs to Congress Party. Visa Versa, if Horse takes over as CM of Goa to reshapes Goa to its lost glory and if that horse belongs to any other party than Congress Party, Goanet will start flooding with accusations and protests against the Horse. If you don't believe this just have patience till Digambar Kamat again changes his loyalty to other party and you will be able to read what you are expecting now. If you still don't believe this, go to archives of Goanet and check what these very same Netters had written against Digambar when he was in BJP. Over night when Digambar changed his loyalty to Congress Party Digamber became martyr of these netters and all allegations against Digambar stopped abruptly as if Sonia (not you) issued whip to all of them! With this explanation, are you still surprised Sonia? Sonia don't get dishearten and continue your contribution to Goanet. Best regards, Dr. U. G. Barad > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:43:44 -0800 (PST) > From: Sonia Kuncalienker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Goanet] Digambar Kamat's RSS(ex??) credentials > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], goanet@lists.goanet.org Dear Kevin- > Firstly I don?t agree with you that religion is an > irrational conviction. True, that when I am born into > a religion, I am that religion without thought ? but > as one grows , and experiences so much more ? one also > questions one?s own religious convictions and then > rationally prefers to continue in the same religion or > converts or abandons all religions altogether, to > which I say ? to each , his own. > > I recently told a friend ? its sad that one has to > ?hide? or ?be ashamed? of one?s born religion, but has > to zealously advocate other religions. Sad, really. > > Dear Edward ? I think you got it wrong ? if as you > believe he was only looking to help only one kind of > people , please go and have an indepth chat with him ? > hopefully ? you will be a little wiser at the end of > it. > > To all gonetters, interestingly ? not one response in > defence or otherwise of shri. Digambar kamat?s ex-RSS > credentials, but all responses only in reference to > mr. parrikar. What?s the issue? Love him , hate him ? > just cant ignore him, what?? > -sonia
