Yes, many times laws may not be ethical - then, perhaps people should
initiate a public debate and work to get the offending laws changed. For
example the GBA has strongly protested an amendment proposed to the TCP Act
in today's Herald.
Incidentally, the first post in response to mine is an excellent example of
how statements are taken selectively out of context to give a meaning not
intended. In my many years I have noticed that this is the hallmark of many
so called "professionals".
BTW THE LETTER UNDER REFERENCE APPEARED IN TODAY'S HERALD IN TRUNCATED FORM.
EITHER ITS AUTHOR OR THE EDITORS OF HERALD FOLLOW STUFF ON GOANET AND ACT
writes Philip Thomas.
I think the author of the above conjecture either over estimates the
influence of his profound thoughts or suffers from an over inflated ego.
Under the circumstances, I do not think the man merits any further response
since he cannot stick to issues but resorts to getting personal.
Diana Pinto
