In recent days HERALD has been carrying short news reports regarding the
plan for a parallel taxiway at Dabolim airport. As indicated this would run
parallel to the runway and facilitate the entry of aircraft to the terminal
and their subsequent exit from it. Previously, aircraft had to traverse
practically the full length of the runway to either begin their take-off run
or to reach the terminal. This held up other aircraft from landing or taking
off and restricted the throughput at Dabolim.

Later, the Navy agreed to the use of the apron in front of one of its
hangars as a holding area for aircraft en route to or from the terminal so
as to free the runway for the use of other aircraft. It is claimed that air
traffic at Dabolim (presently confined mainly to afternoon hours due to
naval restrictions for military flight training purposes in the mornings)
could treble if the taxiway was built. The planned taxiway would cut across
the aprons used for naval maritime patrol aircraft and choppers (but not
fighters). It is hard to understand how the Navy has "agreed in principle"
to this taxiway as long ago as 2006. Perhaps it was due to the boom in civil
aviation at the time and resulting pressure on Dabolim.

The current glitches regarding implementation (coinciding curiously with a
slowdown in traffic growth) are ostensibly on the grounds of sorting out
responsibility for construction (which would take 10 months) and financing
(to the tune of about Rs 80-100 crores). There is reportedly a tussle
between the civil aviation ministry and the naval authorities regarding
this.

We consider that the taxiway cannot be viewed in isolation. There is a major
bottleneck at present regarding aircraft parking bays which number only 6
currently. It is not known what the minimum number has to be if the planned
parallel taxiway becomes operational. To expand this apron space requires
the navy to telescope its two runway crossings into one which is away from
the terminal and then part with airside land. Then there is the terminal
itself which is being sought to be expanded but which is held up because the
Navy has yet to part with a measly two acres of air side land out of the 9
acres promised long ago.

The bottom line is that any progress in expanding Dabolim's capacity for
civilian traffic is bound to be at snail's pace because of the Navy's
arbitrary way of decision making in civilian matters. The implication of
this for Mopa is that it can also grow only at snail's pace for about 20
years since inception so as to avoid upstaging Dabolim and creating demands
for the closure of the latter's civil enclave. The issue then becomes one of
determining the right size of Mopa at start up.  The present ICAO plan for
Mopa has to be scrapped and a new one has to be generated.

Reply via email to