Arundhati Roy's essay on the Sardar Sarovar dam, The Greater Common
Good, was published by Outlook and Frontline magazines in May 1999.
http://www.narmada.org/gcg/gcg.html

In November 2000, environmental historian Ramachandra Guha wrote a
critique of Arundhati Roy's writing and her brand of environmentalism
and politics in The Hindu.
http://www.hindu.com/2000/11/26/stories/13260411.htm


Now I'm not saying Guha is like Santosh Helekar or Roy is like Selma
Carvalho but there are parallels if not similarities in their
approach.

-----------

To selectively quote Guha...

"As a work of analysis, it was unoriginal: Kothari and company had
been there before her. As a piece of literary craftsmanship it was
self-indulgent and hyperbolic."

"Yet her vanity was unreal. Ms. Roy quoted, without irony, the
judgment of her friend that after having written one successful novel
she had seen it all, that a barren stretch of life lay before her
until the final meeting with her Maker."

"Altogether, this was an essay written with passion but without care.
In her stream-of-consciousness style, the arguments were served up in
a jumble of images and exclamations with the odd number thrown in. The
most serious objections to the dam, on grounds of social justice,
ecological prudence and economic efficiency, were lost in the
presentation. What struck one most forcibly was her atavistic hatred
of science and a romantic celebration of adivasi lifestyles."

"Arundhati Roy might very well equal Orwell and Karanth in her
bravery. But she lacks their intellectual probity and judgment. Those
men wrote with a proper sense of gravitas, in a prose that was lucid
but understated, each word weighed before it was uttered. "

"Perhaps we should blame the time we live in for Arundhati Roy's
carelessness. That she is careless is beyond dispute. "

"And the natural bent of this particular celebrity is towards
hyperbole and hysteria. "When NATO bombed Yugoslavia," says Ms. Roy,
"a tiger in the Belgrade zoo got so terrified that it started eating
its own limbs. The people of the Narmada valley will soon start eating
their own limbs."

"I am told that Arundhati Roy has written a very good novel. Perhaps
she should begin another. Her retreat from activism would - to use a
term from economics - be a "Paretto optimum": good for literature, and
good for the Indian environmental movement. "

"Postscript: As this article was going to press, the latest Outlook
arrived, with Ms. Roy's latest venture into social science. It is like
the others: self-regarding and self- indulgent. The essay is also
self-contradictory, a jeremiad against the market and globalisation by
one who is placed in the heart of the global market for
celebrity-hood."

--------

Cheers!

Cecil

=============

Reply via email to