--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Gilbert Lawrence <gilbert2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I appreciate Santosh telling us he has not read any book > on theology. Now we will have to check about other topics he > writes on. >
Gilbert, I said I did not STUDY (not just read) any book on theology, which is what you asked me to do. Please see your quote below: "Please tell us the names of five theological books you have studied (not just read)?" ...Gilbert Lawrence I have certainly read a few books on theology, including parts of the Bible and Bhagvad Gita. The best one I have read so far is "Religion Explained" by Pascal Boyer. Now, you did not answer my questions, or try to calmly respond to the points I made. Instead, you resorted to innuendo and ad hominem. Please see below. What made you engage in this behavior? Cheers, Santosh --- On Mon, 4/20/09, Gilbert Lawrence <gilbert2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Is this what passes off as > intelligent conversation among scientists? > Or is this a bitter brew of mis-guided outrage? > Well ... I guess some scientist have a problem dealing with > the facts. > > I would understand getting some flak from clinicians, for > not being detailed in my explanations. However it appears > that our "pure science" expert cannot handle the facts. > > Relax ... patients really come to see the doctors, because > they love us!