Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:13:01 +0530
From: Frederick [FN] Noronha * ???????? ????????

Please note, I didn't come out aggressively to suggest that Mario's
original statement was incorrect (though there could be further scope
for debate) but only put up a tentative question saying:

> Which Latin American country had a Black president?

In the bargain, I was forced to wonder what exactly goes into forming
"Latin America", and who exactly is a "Black". 

Mario responds:

Aren't you glad you did not come out aggressively?  One has to be very careful 
to even THINK that the only voice on Goanet of reason, truth and peace, can be 
incorrect, because this is a rare ocurrence:-))

Other Latin American Presidents with African blood that come to mind include 
Manuel Noriega of Panama [de facto President] and Papa Doc and Baby Doc 
Duvalier of Haiti, all scurrilous dictators.

When you asked your question I thought you were kidding.

There has been so much ethnic cross-breeding throughout this hemisphere for 
centuries that even Americans and Latin Americans who look white could have 
African blood, just as those who look black, like Obama and Colin Powell and 
Harry Belafonte, have white blood.

Some figures on African blood in Latin American ethnicity are shown here: 
http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Afro:Latin:American.htm

Also, based on the peculiar "one drop" standard that is used by 
African-Americans, if, in fact, Thomas Jefferson, Abe Lincoln and the other 
three American presidents, who all looked white, had black ancestry there had 
to have been others in the western hemisphere.

Fred writes:

While JC might cringe to hear me quoting his favourite knowledge gathering 
tool, the Wikipedia,

Mario observes:

Wikipedia is a convenient tool for most people in the internet age and provides 
decent information most of the time.  Because a broad spectrum individuals have 
an input in the information, including those who are writers and editors of 
recognized encyclopedias, Wikipedia may be more correct than other 
encyclopedias that only a few people have control over because individual 
biases would tend to cancel each other out over a period of time, and abuses 
have declined due to better controls than there were originally.





Reply via email to