G’BYE GOA: MUNDARIS & KHARVIS
By Valmiki Faleiro

Mundaris and Kharvis were the last to arrive among Goa’s ancient, pre-Aryan 
settlers.
Both came from the Chota Nagpur region, like the Asuras and Kols before them. 
They
were, however, the only exception to the pattern where every new tribe 
subjugated the
earlier settlers.

Goa’s original settlers, Mhars, were subjugated by Dhangars/Gonvllis. Both were
subdued by latter day Asuras/Gawdas. Kols/Kunnbis who came next enslaved them 
all.
Mundaris were subservient to Kols in their place of origin. In Goa, Mundaris 
worked
under Kol protection, which possibly yielded the word ‘Mundkar’ (protected.)

Kharvis were perhaps the last to arrive. ‘Kharvi’ is said to be Persian for 
‘boatmen.’ In
Goa, they settled on land’s fringes, by the sea, and were boatmen. The bulk, 
though,
were fishermen, also known as ‘gabits.’

Goan Saraswats, unlike other Brahmins, have a special affinity to fish – and a 
strange
custom linked to Kharvis. At a mournful Saraswat house, a tiny piece of a 
Kharvis’
fishing net will discreetly be kept near the dead body. No Saraswat I know is 
aware of
the reason.

The customs and traditions, both religious and social, of Mundaris and Kharvis 
were
almost similar to those of the Asuras and Kols (remember they all hailed from 
Chota
Nagpur.) Like sacrifice of he-goats and roosters. Community festivals – Shigmo 
of men
and Dhalo of women – were also common, albeit celebrated with subtle 
differences.

Like Asuras and Kols, Mundaris propitiated their deities by sacrificing red or 
black fowl,
depending on the deity’s hierarchal importance. A white fowl was sacrificed 
only for the
Sim-bongas (spirits of the village boundary) at the important festival of ‘Mage 
Porob.’ An
interesting nocturnal procession it was!

On a new moon night, to the beat of drums, Mundaris danced along the line of the
village boundary – sprinkling ‘Charu,’ which was boiled rice mixed with fresh 
blood of a
white rooster. Oddly, the ritual led to inter-village fights, when participants 
of one village
strayed into the land of the adjoining village. The ‘Charu’ line reaffirmed the 
boundary.
(Contemporary Goans don’t seem to have changed much; they still stray into their
neighbour’s property.)

Original tribe names gradually assumed caste connotations like Gaunkar, Gawda,
Kunnbi, Sauli, Velip, Zalmi, etc.

Life revolved around castes. To what extent can be gauged from the form of 
dress. Men
across castes wore only a loincloth. But each caste had its own distinctive 
draping style!
And while others tied it to cotton waistbands, Mhars and cobblers tied theirs 
to ones
made of silk. Wealthy Kols wore silver ones.

Female Kols dressed upto the knees. Women of other castes who could afford it,
dressed in sari, the rear padded portion of which revealed one’s caste. But 
women of
Kalavant caste were debarred from wearing a rear pad or a bodice – even if in 
times
before, the nautch girls dressed in a skirt and bodice. Not all, though, wore 
anything
above the waist. The Portuguese enforced a dress code barring bare breasts in 
public.

Women’s hair styles depended on their caste. Thus, virtually from head to toe, 
from
dress form to socio-religious customs, tribal lifestyles were dictated by one’s 
caste!

Their lingua franca was the Mundari predecessor of Konknni, in the Mauryan 
Prakrit
form. Indo-Aryans described it as the ‘song language’ of India, Sanskritized 
and enriched
it and, like the lands and gods of original settlers, made it their own.

If deities, rituals, festivals and customs of the Asuras, Kols, Mundaris and 
Kharvis of
ancient Goa were common, these also often overlapped with those in the 
neighbouring
states of Karnataka, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. Tribal Goa was integrally 
a part
of South Indian culture. This was to change drastically with the arrival of 
racially different
Indo-European Aryans, who conquered and subjugated Goa’s tribals.

Tribals turned to ‘inferior’ humans. They could enter the new master’s house 
only by the
rear door, after removing footwear and headgear, stand and talk and, if asked 
to sit, do
so on the ground – never in a chair. There was, of course, no question of ever 
sitting
together for a meal ... though a genetic mix-up did occur with offspring of 
tribal women.
(ENDS.)

The Valmiki Faleiro weekly column at:

http://www.goanet.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=330

======================================================================
The above article appeared in the May 31, 2009 edition of the Herald, Goa

Reply via email to