"Borrowed" from Research, and I wish to thank D. Teotonio.  Eric Pinto.

--- On Sat, 7/18/09, Teotonio R. de Souza <te



  




Panjim, Herald, 18 July 2009
http://bit.ly/ k6Kcm
Goan Ethnography and Colonial Anthropology
by Teotonio R. de Souza
Continuing his survey of Goan ethnography, TEOTONIO R DE SOUZA takes a look at 
the development of colonial anthropology

The Introduction of the Ethnography of Goa,Daman and Diu refers to the earlier 
publication of J N da Fonseca's Historical and Archaeological Sketch of the 
City of Goa (1878) as part of the British Imperial Gazetteers. Curiously, there 
is no reference in Bragança Pereira's Etnografia to this classic work in the 
field. There is just one acknowledged reference in the text to a long quotation 
of description of wildlife hunting drawn from the excellent 2-volume 
ethnographic study of A Índia Portuguesa by A. Lopes Mendes (Lisboa, 1886), 
even though there is extensive borrowing of the illustrations without any 
credits to that author, who had drawn many of those sketches himself during his 
field trips as State agronomist in Portuguese India during 1862-1870. At least 
two such illustrations borrowed from Lopes Mendes appear in the end-papers of 
the English version. A comparative study of the two texts reveals textual 
borrowings: the parallel in the description
 of jackfruit on p 140 of Ethnography with that of p 141 of Volume II of Lopes 
Mendes is one such case. A critical edition could have pointed out to such 
unacknowledged borrowings. In the pre-internet times, cross-checking of 
plagiarism was not easy, except for specialists in the field. 
Very deafening is also the absence of any reference to his widely recognized 
colleagues and scholars Pandurang Pissurlencar and Germano da Silva Correia, 
both of whom produced scholarly research about the Maratha castes, including 
Chardós and Ranes in particular. We can now understand why Pandurang 
Pissurlencar may have been ignored. It is not very difficult also to guess the 
author's allergy to the militant of the racial purity of the descendentes, who 
for Bragança Pereira were just a random mixture of the ethnic Portuguese with 
the locals. That is at least what we read in the `Goa Portuguesa' cited below. 
We are told in the new Ethnography that no Portuguese scholar studied Goan 
society before Orlando Ribeiro and his team. If so, who was the Fonseca 
Cardoso, mentioned on p 56, confirming the Rajput origin of the Ranes by 
antropometric research? Armando da Fonseca Cardoso was a military man, who 
served in India and Angola, and died serving in Timor in 1912. A perusal of the 
recent research of Ricardo Roque, published as Antropologia e Império: Fonseca 
Cardoso e a expedição à Índia em 1895 (Lisboa, ICS, 2001) helps to appreciate 
the pioneering place of Fonseca Cardoso's O indígena de Satari in the evolution 
of Portuguese anthropology. One thing he learned from the experience: no one in 
Portugal was interested in his `native of Satari' or in orientalist research 
before he died! It was only after 1916 that he was resurrected by 
anthropologist Antonio Mendes Correia, founder-secretary and president of the 
Portuguese Society of Anthropology and Ethnology
 at Oporto. Mendes Correia occupied important offices during the Estado Novo 
under the Salazar regime and convinced the government about promoting research 
in overseas colonies, giving a place of honour to the so-called Colonial 
Anthropology. 
The Exposition of Oporto was part of the First National Congress of Colonial 
Anthropology. The `native of Satari' by Fonseca Cardoso figured prominently in 
the proceedings of this Congress and Fonseca Cardoso was named the pioneer of 
Portuguese colonial anthropology. Germano Correia also took active part in the 
national and international congresses of anthropology and sought to develop a 
theory of `selective anthropology' of colonial acclimatization. He believed in 
the need of guaranteeing the racial purity for the colonial future. He set up a 
laboratory for anthropometric studies in Luanda when Norton de Matos was there 
as Governor (he had been Forest Officer in Goa earlier). Later he set up 
similar laboratory at the Goa Medical College and developed it into a 
full-fledged and State-financed Gabinete de Antropologia do Estado da Índia 
after 1926. 
Bragança Pereira's first studies on ethnography need to be placed in this 
context and ideological trends. The valuable contribution of Constâncio 
Mascarenhas (1898-1978) to anthropological studies, in Goa and in Oporto, could 
also deserve some mention in the Introduction. A B de Bragança Pereira acted as 
President of the Permanent Commission of Archaeology during the two decades of 
1931-1951. He gathered assiduously in the Epigraphic Museum of Old Goa many 
Hindu idols destroyed during the early Portuguese conversion drive and 
inscriptions on stones that lay uncared for all over Goa. He resumed the 
publication of the journal O Oriente Português, and from 1934 initiated the 
publication of a new series of Arquivo Português Oriental, to which we have 
already made a critical reference earlier. 
Bragança Pereira did not take part in the much publicised First Imperial 
Exposition of Oporto in 1934, nor in the international exposition `O Mundo 
Português' (The Portuguese World) in 1940. His son believes that his father 
sought to avoid expressing publicly any view that could run counter to his 
judicial functions. Apparently, it was for the same reasons that he avoided 
studiously to pronounce about the political implications of the controversial 
Acto Colonial. However, he did not shy away from participating in the 
State-organized Provincial Congresses or collaborating actively in the 
newspapers Debate and O Heraldo. I presume that there were other political 
rivalries that hijacked the participation in the expositions of Oporto and 
Lisbon. Bragança Pereira wrote about `Goa Portuguesa' in the proceedings of the 
Colóquio Internacional de Estudos Luso-Brasileiros held in Washington in 1950. 
It was reprinted by the Goa Department of Information in the
 series of `Divulgação e Cultura' or cultural propaganda. It was nothing better 
than that, instead of an expected grand crowning finale of reputed scholarship. 
Intellectual production within the colonial system meant self-censorship for 
Goan scholars at all times, and this became a more pressing requirement during 
the Salazar regime. Filipe Neri Xavier was a pioneer who left a series of 
documentary collections of great value and indispensable reference for any 
modern researcher on Goan traditional social institutions. Even though the 
author lived in an atmosphere of relative constitutional freedom, he did not 
find the courage to venture beyond compiling documents. There is no attempt at 
interpreting the data or imputing blame to anyone. In an introduction to Part 
II of the first edition of his famous Bosquejo we read: "I have not taken upon 
myself the task of presenting my reflections upon the content of the documents 
published herein, not only because it would be alien to my intended goal, but 
also due to my lack of sufficient strength to do it." 
P S S Pissurlencar presented a paper at the Congress on the Portuguese World 
(1940) on `The Hindu collaborators of Afonso de Albuquerque' . He also compiled 
a massive volume on Agentes da Diplomacia Portuguesa na Índia (Bastorá, 1952), 
seeking discreetly to prove that the Hindu community had served the colonial 
masters with unremitting constancy and zeal. This truth may give little comfort 
to those making political capital today out of their little knowledge of the 
past. A B Bragança Pereira was no different in this respect, but ironically and 
unfortunately for him, unlike F N Xavier and P S S Pissurlencar, he died in 
independent India and with greater freedom to continue praising the glories of 
the Portuguese colonial achievements than in his homeland of Goa.
__._,_.___
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Database 
«Research» is not bias-free, but we can try to make it emotion-free! 
[Moderator] 
 
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to 
Traditional 
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 



Recent Activity


 1
New FilesVisit Your Group 



Give Back
Yahoo! for Good
Get inspired
by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar
Get it Free!
easy 1-click access
to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups
Start a group
in 3 easy steps.
Connect with others.
. 

__,_._,___















Reply via email to