------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G * O * A * N * E * T *** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sangath, www.sangath.com, is looking to build a centre for services, training 
and research and seeks to buy approx 1500 to 2000 sq mtrs land betweeen Mapusa 
and Bambolim and surrounding rural areas. Please contact: contac...@sangath.com 
or yvo...@sangath.com or ph+91-9881499458
http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2009-July/180028.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fr.Ivo wrote:

[1] In the case of tubal ectopic pregnancy surgery is needed.
[2] Physician has to decide about the surgical removal of tubal
ectopic pregnancy.
[3] The point is that there is no wilful killing of the fetus. The
life of the mother is saved by tubal cleaning.
[4] The unborn child is already deceased.
[5] While saving the life of the mother through surgical removal, the
fetus is dead, not wilfully killed.


Dear Fr. Ivo,

I am trying to understand your view point.

Are you suggesting that in ectopic pregnancy cases, the fetus is
ALWAYS 'already deceased before the surgeon operates on the 'tubes' ?

BTW: I'd like you to spend a few moments to think about this
topic....and then give us your thought.

WHY ...when the US President, Senate, and House was in Republican
hands - and the Supreme Court headed by Roberts et al, did the Right
to Lifers NOT get abortion made illegal?

Do you have any evidence that these Right to Lifers are against War or
against the Death Penalty

jc

Reply via email to