> Mario wrote:

> The funniest part of their speeches was when they thrashed capitalism as a
> failed system, then turned around and demanded that the capitalists pay
> THEM billions of dollars to clean up their environments:-))

Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:29:24 -0500
From: "Bosco D" <bos...@canada.com>

>From a Goan context is the suggestion being made that students and alumni 
of Chowgule College, Dempo College, etc, should not protest the drawbacks of 
mining in Goa because they attended schools setup by philantrophists of the 
Chowgule and Dempo families??

Mario responds:

The Goan context referred to is bogus.  The point I was making is that if 
capitalism is such a failed system relative to Hugo Chavez's communism, his 
communist country would not need handouts from capitalism to clean up their 
environment.  Hugo Chavez's Venezuela is one of the economic basket cases in 
the world in spite of all his God given oil reserves and has a 60% poverty 
rate, which is what makes his criticizing capitalism so ludicrous.  Wise up.

The closer equivalent of Bosco's Goan mining analogy would be if Goan miners 
were to suggest that other industries in Goa were destroying the Goan 
environment.

Mario previously wrote:

> WARNING: The author, Tim Ball, Ph.D. is a skeptic when it comes to
> blaming puny humans for climate changes.

Bosco wrote:

Tim Ball?? The less said the better. Is that the best skeptic around?? 
Here is a snippet of Ball's own words [1]:

Mario responds:

Here we see that Bosco has been unable to point to a single thing that Tim Ball 
wrote in the article I had posted and respond to it, and instead is trying to 
scurrilously cast general aspersions on Mr. Ball using his comments made in 
another situation out of context, to try and deflect attention from what he 
wrote about the farce in Copenhagen.  Whether you agree with him or not Mr. 
Ball is a climate scientist.  Bosco selectively swallows whatever Al Gore and 
Rajendra Pachauri tell him, neither of whom are climate scientists.

One of the problems with the climate change debate is that its most highly 
acclaimed spokespersons are documented charlatans like Mr. Gore and Mr. 
Pachauri who are lining their own pockets.  The foremost climate scientists 
from the University of East Anglia in Britain were also recently shown to have 
ulterior motives and engaging in scurrilous unscientific behavior including 
destroying raw data, conspiring to keep data from scientists who may disagree, 
and conspiring to keep the work of opposing scientists from being peer reviewed 
and published. Such behavior from scientists should make real research 
scientists like Santosh cringe and put a question mark over the the validity of 
their entire body of work.

For the last ten years the environmental extremists have been telling us the 
earth is going to hell and we must destroy only the western economies in order 
to save the world.  Now we find that the earth has not warmed since 1998.


Reply via email to