Read the news in today's Times of India given below, which shows there is no 
co-ordination between govt departments. The letter to keep the matter in 
abeyance was sent by revenue secretary on 9/8/2010. The principal recipient of 
letter was the Collector himself. How did he not receive it for 9 days in 
Margao whereas the recipient of copy, the Dy. collector, Quepem promptly 
received it on 11/8/2010? 
 
The road from Tilamol to Cotarli is proposed to facilitate mining traffic. The 
PWD under pressure from miners had sought police protection for survey. The 
collector who is also under influence of miners tried to help them out by 
providing police. He has always been saying in the last two years that he has 
no police available to control mining traffic and to challan overloading and 
speeding by truck drivers from Orissa and Zharkhand.
 
The lcollector sent the letter on 17/8/2010 and delivered to locals on same day 
late evening through police asking them to be present themselves on 18/8/2010 
at 11am at his Margao office. Why this haste? Does it not imply excessive 
interest on part of collector and point to pressure/influence from interested 
people, the 12 miners as stated by Collector himself in his order of 10/4/2010? 
Can any hearing be held without giving sufficient notice? The miners probably 
expected that the locals would find it difficult to attend at such a short 
notice and hoped to get ex-parte order for police protection.
 
Incidently, the land acquisition for this road for mining is taken up merely on 
the basis of a letter from MLA, who has no executive powers. Locals have 
questioned why PWD did not carry out any studies to arrive whether the road is 
needed for public urpose. The secretary, Revenue upheld this as PWD did not 
complete the procedures they are supposed to complete and hence kept the land 
acquisition under abeyance. Incidently, the task of planning mining roads was 
taken away from the PWD and was given to a steering committee formed by mines 
department vide order of 3/6/2010. PWD taking decisions without taking the said 
committe into confidence is also another case of lack of cordination. 
 
Incidently it has also come to notice that the Goa-PWD has no procedures for 
planning a road. Whereas Central-PWD has a clearcut procedure manual to follow. 
Why is there no procedure? No body in PWD seems aware. A RTI application is 
being made seeking written or approved or implied procedure.  
 
TOI news:
 
MARGAO: In a classic instance that effectively dramatized the lack of 
coordination between government agencies, the PWD requisitioned the collector 
for providing police protection for its personnel for demarcating the alignment 
for the four-laning of Tilamol-Curchorem road when the government has already 
kept the project in abeyance. 

This came to light during a meeting chaired by south Goa collector G P Naik on 
Wednesday of affected Curchorem residents opposing the four-laning of the road. 

It may be recalled that Curchorem residents had recently chased away PWD 
officials demarcating the area for widening the road. 

Naik, also the district magistrate, had convened the meeting hoping to persuade 
the agitators not to obstruct the PWD officials in their task. This puzzled the 
Curchorem residents who were informed by government officials that the 
four-laning had already been kept in abeyance. 

Naik maintained that he was unaware about the work being kept in abeyance and 
insisted that the residents fall in line. To Naik`s embarrassment, a resident 
produced a copy of the letter by the revenue department addressed to the south 
Goa collector pointing out that the project had indeed been kept in abeyance 
"till the matter is approved by the steering committee" constituted by the 
directorate of mines and geology. 

Left red-faced, Naik gave the PWD officials a dressing down for the faux pas, 
while the protestors walked away. 
var zz=0;var sldsh=0;var bellyaddiv = ' ';
                                                                                
                                                                        
                                                                                
        var stindex=100;
                                                                                
        var stp=150;
                                                                                
        var taglen=0;
                                                                                
        var tmp;
                                                                                
        var tagcheck = new Array("div","span","br","font","a");
                                                                                
        var storycontent = document.getElementById("storydiv").innerHTML;
                                                                                
        var firstpara = 
storycontent.substring(0,storycontent.toLowerCase().indexOf("")).toLowerCase();
                                                                                
        function findptt(cnt){
                                                                                
        zz++;
                                                                                
        if(zz == 10)return;
                                                                                
                var xxx=-1,yyy=-1;
                                                                                
                var ccnt = cnt;
                                                                                
                for(ii=0; ii < tagcheck.length; ii++){
                                                                                
                        xxx = ccnt.indexOf("


Reply via email to