---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   **** http://www.GOANET.org ****
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Goanet joins Noel Rebello to raise money for Daddy's Home (Margao, Goa)
     Sponsor Noel as he climbs Mt. Kilimanjaro (5,882m or 19,298 ft)

       Make a donation at www.Goanet.org, click on MAKE A DONATION,
              state "Daddy's Home" in the Donation comments

        For more information see: http://bit.ly/SupportDaddysHome

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps this seemingly inconclusive topic may prolong inconclusively as long as the obscure gray line demarcating noumenon and phenomenon is not explained in black and white.

The arrogance of the scientist often prevents him from seeing that he is as much a believer as a mystic is. A scientist believes in phenomenon and adamantly refuses to believe until ‘The first cause’ or ‘God’ is proven as a fact. He is willing ( or is he?) to believe in Him only if he sees God as a gray bearded fellow and shakes His hand! A mystic finds it meaningful to approach the subject differently by saying “Thou indeed art, O Lord, reveal Thy glorious form unto me.” The two approaches are obviously opposed; that there is a conflict is but understandable.

The conflict, however, is neither in the scientist's mind (since he is convinced of god's non-existence), nor is it in the mind of the mystic who has 'found' God by virtue of his mystical experience. Yet a mystic claims to have arrived at a definite conclusion to his inquiry. The scientist, with his typical nonchalance “does not care” ( as quoted by Dr. Helekar) to explain “the meaning” of life. He allows, rather imperatively, 'subjective' belief to whoever that seeks some desperate formula to allay his troubled mind regarding 'meaning of life'.

The question troubles seekers of 'meaning' beyond the mere explanation of phenomenon. It is indeed a question which falls in the supra-physical realm. Adherents of science, since it “does not care” to explain supra-physical matter should not bother to enter in the discussion regarding the topic that's beyond their purview. Instead, the scientist or the disciple of science proffers to proclaim his prejudice. “Hail”, he says, “God does not exist, for I do not care whether He exists or not!”


Charudatta Prabhudesai

Reply via email to