On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:47:56 -0700, Santosh Helekar wrote :<<< This appears to imply that the person who criticizes, condemns and complains about mainstream medical publications on Goanet is a fool. A person who merely copies and pastes links to such articles without reading them, or the references in them, as is the case here by self-admission, must be worse. Cheers, Santosh>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:19:26 -0700, George Pinto wrote :<<< May I kindly request Gilbert to take a positive approach and discuss medical articles by real medical publications and not some non-peer reviewed website. George>>> COMMENT : It is correct beyond doubt what Gilbert quoted: <<Quote: Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do.>> as is seen by the above two criticisms, condemnations & complaints. A forum can discuss issues only when one is able to see an issue from all angles, and by not having an unilateral view. That is known as rationalism. The facts about frauds or lies in medical publication is not a fiction as one is made to conclude from the above two criticism. In medical research, time and again the very real and traditional mechanisms for the preservation of errors trump those more elusive ones for their self-correction, despite some recent attempts to make medicine now allegedly "evidence-based" (even though it was supposed to have been based on scientific evidence all along). Medical evidence is difficult to verify and validate because it is easy to fake or cloak data from clinical trials. These are reported under the honour system, and peer reviewers or readers are unlikely to catch clever manipulations or fudging. The potential for introducing flawed data into the doctrine is therefore high. And when people speak openly about it, here we hear: “non-peer reviewed websites”. Maybe even news by the Fourth estate require to be peer reviewed by such sceptics. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/et-cetera/us-grapples-with-scientific-research-frauds/articleshow/3147054.cms http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/10/18/jme.2010.038125.abstract Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
Re: [Goanet] Lies in Medical Publications
Dr . Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:42:29 -0700
- [Goanet] Lies in Medical Publications Gilbert Lawrence
- Re: [Goanet] Lies in Medical Publica... Santosh Helekar
- Re: [Goanet] Lies in Medical Publica... George Pinto
- Re: [Goanet] Lies in Medical Publica... Dr . Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão
- Re: [Goanet] Lies in Medical Pub... Santosh Helekar