I do not believe that any of the following terms used by Nascy fit
Aires i.e. sly, pro-BJP, and Fascist fan. If in doubt, try review his
recent attempt and (prospective) arrangements at winning a seat in the
CCP elections.

If anything, Aires is ONLY 100% pro-Aires, and nobody should get upset
about that - as long as no third party is needlessly and unjustifiably
jammed in the process.

I am not very sure what Aires has accomplished more as a lawyer: (a)
Challenging the unscrupulous or (b) Harassing those who cross his
path. It is the latter, I believe, which will result (has resulted) in
Aires being less successful and less trusted than he should be or
could have been. That, and forever being involved in
disorder-generating controversies. It is almost as though the learned
gentlemen needs to create disorder in order to feel good.

As far as the Rahul Gandhi post, it is possible that Aires just made
the error of "rushing to judgement' - also adding the well worn
xenophobic, anti-Sonia cliché containing drivel characteristic of the
saffron lot.

Not very sure if Aires will withdraw that statement - or merely, as he
is known to do, just "stand by his words".

jc


[1]  Nascy Caldeira wrote:

Aires Rodrigues has hereby proved that he has been and still is a sly
and pro BJP/ saffron parties' Fascist fan. How else could an
accomplished lawyer make such 'deliberate' blunders? Because his mind
is clouded by saffron fascism!

[2] jc (earlier)

The 1 Rupee question is this: Did Rahul Gandhi state that he is/was
ASHAMED TO BE AN INDIAN?

The other xenophobic bias from Aires having been noted,  IT IS TIME
that "we" read carefully and quote accurately before "we" fly off the
proverbial handle.

Reply via email to