To my understanding, *apolitical* would mean the group itself doesn't take political sides. Not that its individual members don't have political views.
If you extend the argument below to its logical extreme, members too should not have their own political views. The credibility of an NGO would depend on its work and its record, not the overt or covert links of individuals who happen to be part of it, I would think. FN FN +91-832-2409490 or +91-9822122436 (after 2pm) #784 Nr Lourdes Convent, Saligao 403511 Goa India http://fn.goa-india.org http://goa1556.goa-india.org On 20 June 2011 00:21, Eugene Correia <eugene.corr...@gmail.com> wrote: > My dear Floriano why ask me those questions. Each party must have its > own manifesto, and I have read your "roadmap." > The main question that you must answer is why the GRA is entertaining > a "politician" like you when it says it is apolitical. I see a > hypocrisy in this and please answer if you do think it so or not. > If I was in your place, I would have resigned from the GRA and pursued > my goals or interests of the party without aligning with any NGO. > When a politician becomes part of an NGO the NGO loses credibility. > This is the first lesson you should have learnt in your education to > become a true politician.. Ask yourself if you are doing the right > thing. >
