Dear JC,
Thank you for your valuable  perspective which comes from long medical practice 
and experience in India and a country other than India. My feeling and near 
conviction is that Psychiatric practice in most settings is not sustainable 
over a long period of time for the Psychiatrist as the Psychiatrist looks upon 
himself/herself as a "SELF-CONTAINED " professional. This leads to loading from 
the counter-transference from patients, till some of them reach the tip-over 
point and break. Studies have reported that the healing outcome is directly 
related to the personal effectiveness of the mental health professional in 
his/her own personal life. A Jesuit counsellor has  reported that Patients 
receiving therapy from therapists(following same system of Psychiatry) have 
different outcomes. Helpful outcomes for patients are shown to have a 
co-relation to the "effectiveness" of the therapist in his/her personal life. 
He therefore says that " an effective
 counsellor is one who personalises his own personal deficiency, converts this 
deficiency into a goal and takes steps to reach the goal." Furthermore " the 
effective counsellor constantly recycles his goals and keeps alive the process 
of learning"
 
When psychiatrists arrogate to themself, whether knowingly or unknowingly, a 
power to always help patients, then  the first step to destruction is mounted. 
Albeit in another branch of Science like thermodymamics it is a truism "THAT A 
SELF- CONTAINED SYSTEM ALWAYS COLLAPSES" a similar belief is yet to take firmly 
root in Psychiatry. This is where the acceptance of SPIRITUALITY in Psychiatry 
by the Harvard Medical School is relevant. Quite similarly belief in an 
interacting ,inter-dependent, Cosmos, and a belief in Divine Justice and 
Mercy , as well as an Afterlife is the spirituality required to dissipate the 
inherent stress of the psychiatric profession. Resort to an Annual confession, 
preferably to a Catholic Priest, irrespective of conviction, (because a 
Catholic Priest is bound by an oath of secrecy ,quite unlike  a psychiatrist 
who may report the condition as a " case" after covering identfying details) 
could be a useful adjunct, till society
 under law legalises and sets up INDIVIDUALS who are authorised to hear 
Psychiatrists , and not report the details under pain of life imprisonmrnt,even 
if it involves a conflict, whether immediate,expedient or long-term, between 
the common good and individuals.The need to be heard and  forgiven, and the 
process of being heard and forgiven leads to catharsis and wholeness. It 
releases the human potential for continued growth.
Warm regards,
 Gerry.
P.S. I forgot to assert that the difference between a Psychiatrist and a 
Catholic Priest (in the Sacrament of Reconciliation)  is that of DEGREE and not 
of TYPE. Both discharge similar functions in a world where the human faculty to 
listen non-judgementally with unconditional positive regard having its roots in 
respect for the human person is fast disappearing.  

Reply via email to