I would like to point out inaccuracies in the post appended below. A person 
qualified in modern medicine should be easily able to figure out a genuine 
medical website from a bogus one. Nearly all properly trained physicians and 
medical scientists do. They regard spreading bogus medical information in 
internet forums as unethical, irrespective of whether it is from crazy 
conspiratorial websites or from the medical practitioner's own wild imagination.

There is absolutely no credible evidence for a conspiratorial nexus between 
global marketing mafias, drug companies and scientists. Making such claims is 
irresponsible. There are only individual unethical professionals, as is the 
case with corruption in all walks of life. Please do not be suckered in to 
believing in world-wide criminal conspiracy theories.

Cheers,

Santosh 

Ferdinando Falcao wrote:
>
>COMMENT : I don’t see Con writing any medical advice in his posts. All
>he does is directs you to what is already on the website. Ah yes; he does 
>>write when he passes comments on those who criticise. And then there are 
>>others who actually give medical advice citing certain websites as >accurate 
>and genuine, instead of advising caution, warning of global >marketing mafias, 
>drug Companies & Scientists nexus, etc.  At least  Con >is not from the 
>medical field, and I do not see how
>anyone can sue him for medical advice.
>

Reply via email to