I would like to point out inaccuracies in the post appended below. A person qualified in modern medicine should be easily able to figure out a genuine medical website from a bogus one. Nearly all properly trained physicians and medical scientists do. They regard spreading bogus medical information in internet forums as unethical, irrespective of whether it is from crazy conspiratorial websites or from the medical practitioner's own wild imagination.
There is absolutely no credible evidence for a conspiratorial nexus between global marketing mafias, drug companies and scientists. Making such claims is irresponsible. There are only individual unethical professionals, as is the case with corruption in all walks of life. Please do not be suckered in to believing in world-wide criminal conspiracy theories. Cheers, Santosh Ferdinando Falcao wrote: > >COMMENT : I don’t see Con writing any medical advice in his posts. All >he does is directs you to what is already on the website. Ah yes; he does >>write when he passes comments on those who criticise. And then there are >>others who actually give medical advice citing certain websites as >accurate >and genuine, instead of advising caution, warning of global >marketing mafias, >drug Companies & Scientists nexus, etc. At least Con >is not from the >medical field, and I do not see how >anyone can sue him for medical advice. >