E DeSousa wrote:
Whle the US national debt at approx. $14.9 Trillions, it should be noted that 
the GDP (Sum of all Goods and Services produced ) of the US is approximately 
15.04 T (year 2011). Debt/GDP ratio of 99.46%. For example, US debt to GDP 
ratio peaked just after World War II (112.7% of GDP in 1945). Now that the 
Middle East wars are winding down the ratio is expected to ease.

While these statistics are mind boggling, it should be noted that quite a few 
important countries in the world operates in this zone. 
Look at :
Country              Debt: GDP ratio 
India                     65%
Italy                   136% 
Australia           139%    
Spain                169%
Germany           183%
Portugal             207%
France               254%
Sweden             262%
Hong Kong        265%
Switzerland        391%
UK                     451%  (External debt per person= $161,000)
Ireland               1,239%        

So, what is to be done? Perhaps they will all choose the easy way out and 
devalue their currencies and in the new paradigm the Indian Rupee will rise in 
value. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------

E,
I grew up in an economy that depended on agriculture for survival. 
Every time there was a drought in Tanzania or the crops failed, the Tz govt had 
to borrow money from the IMF. The IMF had two conditions for Tanzania and every 
other country that came begging for loans. 


The IMF insisted that the borrower:
1)  cut govt expenditure i.e.health, education and military spending 
2)  devalue its currency.


As far as devaluation is concerned, it only works if your main trading partners 
do not devalue their currencies too. Else you start a war where the country to 
devalue its currency the most, becomes the winner (sic). This is exactly what 
is going on today with the above nations.

As for cutting government expenditures, this can only be done by a political 
party that does not want to be re-elected. As such, the govts in power today 
are trying all sorts of gimmicks to reduce their debt without reducing 
expenditures. All they are really doing is making the problem worse. 

Returning once again to the family example, I think you may agree with me that 
anyone who really wants to pay off his debt, has to first reduce his spending. 

The alternative is to become bankrupt. 


Mervyn2121

Reply via email to