Once again, I am grateful that the infra attached post, make no derogatory remarks against women.
Hopefully, "we" are moving forward......and (inter alia) Selma and Sonia will be spared further "patshalla ingraji" abuse. jc On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:07 AM, "U. G. Barad" <dr.udayba...@gmail.com> wrote: > 'Patshalla Ingraji' is much better to understand than "Portual-Ingreje' - a > complex, twisted and crooked English. Point (b) will give some idea of so > called pure English! > > U. G. Barad > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 J. Colaco cola...@gmail.com wrote: > > U. G. Barad <dr.udayba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1: JC's response (appended below) in no way answers any of my > questions posed to FN! > > 2: I'm equally surprised to see JC acting as spokesperson "TO" FN!! > > > COMMENT: > > a: Once again, I am grateful that the poster of the supra quoted, has > scripted a few lines without resorting to any derogatory remarks about > women. > > b: The need for English as MOI in primary schools is best exemplified > by folks who stubbornly insist of writing in "Patshalla Ingraji". > > jc > > >
