HINDI FILM “KYA SUPER COOL HAIN HUM” HURTS RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS OF CHRISTIANS

Mr Shantaram Naik M P has taken strong objection to certain scenes in hindi movie Kya Super Cool Hain Hum in which a Christian priest is shown in bad light solemnizing marriage of two dogs.

Mr Naik mentioned the matter to Mrs Ambika Soni, Union Minister of Information and broadcasting, although, Mr Naik told the minister that he was aware of the fact that the Central Government has no power to review the decision of the Censor Board and hence he was writing to Central Board of Film Certification.

In a letter sent to the Chairperson of the Board, Mrs Leela Samson with a copy to CEO Smt Pankaja Thakur, Mr Naik stated "A Hindi feature film entitled "Kya super cool hain hum" has been released throughout the country a few weeks back. The film, which is basically a comedy film, is reportedly running to packed Houses in the country."

In one of the scenes in the film, a Christian priest has been shown in bad light and is shown solemnising 'marriage' of two dogs, Mr Naik says.

Mr Naik further states ,"this scene has hurt the religious sentiments of Christian community which hails a priest in high esteem, and that, a priest is not only bestowed with serious religious duties, but is supposed to be guide and philosopher to many members of the community."

Comedy certainly is a part of all every society but, while presenting comedies in any art form, no one's religious sentiments can be hurt. Freedom of expression does not give license to a film producer or director play with the sentiments of others, much less with religious sentiments, he says.

The film contains a number of double-meaning filthy dialogues. I have no objection to them if they have been considered as permissible by the Censor Board. But, in a movie with this type of background, showing a Christian priest solemnising 'marriage' of two dogs, is all the more objectionable, Mr Naik says in his letter.

Formerly, the Union Government exercised powers to review decisions of Film Censor Board but , it is learnt that the provision which provided this power to the Central Government has been taken away by a decision of Supreme Court, Mr Naik says.

In any case, Producers, Directors and others in charge of film production and distribution are liable to be hauled up under sections 295A and 298 which are the two main provisions dealing with offences relating to religions, mentioned in the Indian Penal Code, Mr Naik says.

Therefore, although the power of Union Government of reviewing the decision of Film Censure Board is not available with the Central Government, Central Board of Film Certification can review their decisions on grounds that the board could not assess the impact of disputed / controversial scenes on the society till after the film was released or any other grounds available to a quasi- judicial authority, and also, on grounds that certain scenes in the film violate the sections of the Indian Penal Code mentioned above, he says.

Besides, it must be remembered that section 295A is a cognizable offence, and therefore, it is the duty of police machinery to act and arrest the culprits.

Arresting culprits does not come within the jurisdiction of board, but exhibition of a film which involves such serious consequences , should not be allowed to be exhibited any longer by the board, Mr Naik adds.

Mr Naik was allowed to raise the issue in the Rajya Sabha, today, but on account of the disruption of the House by the BJP on black money issue, Mr Naik could not make his submission.


SHANTARAM NAIK, M.P.
shantaram...@gmail.com

Reply via email to