Assuming what you write is accurate, is the suggestion being made that the
land acquisition in North America by the Mormons and that by the
Parshuramites in Goa .... was / is similar?

jc

On Sunday, 30 September 2012, eric pinto wrote:

>
>  At the Mormon core is the Smith myth of an angel "Moroni" introducing
> settlers from the same Holy Land to North America.
>   I invite you to google for more on the subject.      eric.
>
> ________________________________
> Earlier eric pinto <ericpin...@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> quoted the
> following from William
> Robert Da Silva <wrdsilva@ who  wrote:
>
> "Here 'long donated life' to Parashurama until he 'creates' the land for
> his brahmana is no better or worse than the use of the Bible,
> acquisition of holy land, by American settlers."
>
> QUESTION: (while the above quoted sentence may contain a typo)
>
> Which 'American settlers' used the BIBLE for the acquisition of which
> HOLY LAND (or acquire which HOLY LAND); Holy Land to WHOM?
>
> COMMENT:
>
> This whole NONSENSE aka Caste system is a method of suppression of
> others for the purpose of satisfying one's own avarice.
>
> http://www.colaco.net/1/caste.htm
>
> And, the subcontinent which has seen (and recorded) such horrific
> violence (glorified like all other violent allegedly HOLY WARS)
> continues to have pompous individuals who claim how 'Non-Violent' the
> people (esp the so-called Brahmans) were and are..
>
> The pompous and often 'fowl-mouthed' ones are also 'ostrich-like' when
> they continue to abuse other Indian citizens because of their (say)
> Italian heritage .... (perhaps) quite oblivious to DNA evidence which
> will point their heritage to Ruskies, Iranis, Jews, Huns and Greeks
> etc etc.
>
> Granted that they may not know much about history or genetics. Are
> they aware of the Constitution?
>
> jc
>
> ps: If one studies the various battles (in court and elsewhere)
> individuals have fought for the purposes of land, one will develop a
> distinct opinion that 'property' which one has not worked for or which
> one has not acquired peacefully, is a Panvath.
>

Reply via email to