response to manuel tavares: re: jc 1: After all, the alleged Freedom Fighters provided them with Rights without advising them of their Responsibilities
manuel tavares 1a " I would like jc to prove which freedom fighter provided these People with rights. Proof which is tangible and verifiable. Not just statements pulled out of thin air." manuel tavares 1b: " If people migrate to another place where the customs are different, isn't it incumbent up to the new migrant to at least learn the basic customs?' jc RESPONSE1: As the issue of 'RIGHTS' is a LEGAL matter, Mr. Tavares may wish to review the relevant section of Art 19 of the Indian Constitution. He may then access Art 360 of the same Constitution to ascertain WHAT the Kashmiris secured before agreeing to accession. Constitutional Law is not my field but this I can definitely state: What is "incumbent" upon an individual to do, has not yet been legislated in any Common Law country. == re jc 2: (a) is it possible that the Freedom Fighters were thinking ahead in terms of Organic Farming? (b) do we remember the Konkani term for 'going to the toilet' ? manuel tavares 2: " Again jc Proof please that Freedom fighters had anything to do with Inviting these immigrants to Fertilize the land organically. Or is this the new Indian Agricultural Policy according to jc." jc RESPONSE2: Oh English! Why dost though allow this non-AngloIndian (me) to write in non-euphemistic terms which have the penchant of leading some of us astray? jc BTW: Enjoyed Mervyn Lobo's response to "frightened by Expats expertise" FN!