RESPONSE: I may be wrong and may stand corrected but I think these Dance girls are the same as the massage parlour girls - they get most of their moolah from prostitution.
On 30 August 2013 03:04, Jose Colaco <cola...@gmail.com> wrote: > (1) Dr Barad wrote that: " permission (was) given by the Supreme Court (of > India) to reopen the dance bars in Maharashtra, on the grounds of so many > of the dancers being thrown out of employment. > > (2) Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão: " The Supreme Court of India merely > upheld the 2006 Judgement and Order of the Bombay High Court in this case; > in that it was violative of right to > equality guaranteed under the Constitution. The Maharashtra government > banned dance bars in eateries, bars, etc. under the Police Act. But > permitted dance bars in 3 stars and above hotels. This is what was > discriminatory and struck down." > > > Question and Comment: > > Question: In legal matters, who should I believe? Someone who refers to > gossip and imagination or someone who refers to Law Reports? > > Comment: In a land of Devadasi temple girls and 'court dancers' a la > Anarkali, we portray rather pitiful and hypocritical selves by raising this > big hue and cry about these dance bars. > > What wrong is there, I ask, if adult women earn a living by willingly > dancing to make men happy? > > My only concern would be if they were exploited by the uncouth Indian men > patrons who are often depraved enough to rape and gang rape women and pimps > who would infest such establishments, NOT to forget those Bakshishwallas. > > jc > > > > > > -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.