On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:44:52 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although signature support is really relevant, most of our binary
packages still don't have correct signatures. So, it look like to me
we are 'crying wolf' at this time, and, in the future, when we got to
have all our packages signed, the user may look to a signature error
from a package that _was_ hacked and think "Oh that's normal. All I
have to do is to force the installation.".
More things to add to this is that there's a bug in the current release,
making VerifyProgram die on _all_ packages. This is correted in CVS.
--
/Jonas
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
