No, no specific ordering is required here. Using chronological order at this case for no big reason.
On 9/3/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CVSROOT: /sources/goboscripts > Module name: tools > Changes by: André Detsch <detsch> 06/09/03 03:28:12 > > Modified files: > BuildLiveCD/Data: Packages-List-NonBase > > Log message: > Added Audacious & dependencies. > > CVSWeb URLs: > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/tools/BuildLiveCD/Data/Packages-List-NonBase?cvsroot=goboscripts&r1=1.5&r2=1.6 > > Patches: > Index: Packages-List-NonBase > =================================================================== > RCS file: /sources/goboscripts/tools/BuildLiveCD/Data/Packages-List-NonBase,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6 > --- Packages-List-NonBase 2 Sep 2006 00:24:24 -0000 1.5 > +++ Packages-List-NonBase 3 Sep 2006 03:28:12 -0000 1.6 > @@ -99,3 +99,6 @@ > NTFSProgs > Unsermake > CDRTools > +TagLib > +LibGlade > +Audacious I though the list was alphabetical-ordered. Is there a reason to list the packages this way? Are dependencies listed first? -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
-- Andre Detsch _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
