On 11/14/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/14/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > so this will break boot on minimal > > > installations. I think it's better to leave it commented, letting the > > > installer to enable it. > > > > > How do you mean to let the installer enable it? Should the recipe include > > a sed command or are you refering to the installer on the CD? > > I was thinking about the installer on the CD. > > > There should be an easy way to make apps enable tasks at bootup by > > default. I'm starting to think that rc.d directory isn't that bad after > > all. :) > > Maybe only issue a message to the user if a task if found after a > given package/recipe is installed? I think it's better than allowing > automagical inclusion of tasks in BootUp, as sometimes one might want > to put it in a special order based on what already exists.
Agreed, I'm not keen on fiddling with the user's BootUp either. BootUp should be simple enough so that the user can edit it. For tasks that are not as simple as adding a line, then create a Task. -- Hisham _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
