On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:40:14 +0100, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:43:09 +0100, Hisham Muhammad > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 11/28/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> As we have now a better quality control for recipes and, specially, >>> for binary packages (which used to have all kind of wrong >>> auto-dependencies), I think is time to do a major cleanup at the >>> CompatibilityList. >>> >>> I don't like much to have this file, but removing the above entries >>> would make the file a little less ugly. >> >> I'd add Tcl: Tcl-Tk to the list of candidates for removal. Shouldn't >> be necessary once we standardise on one over the other (last I >> checked, separate Tcl and Tk works fine). >> > Are you sure? There was a thread about this earlier when you made the > same claim and I wanted proof, but I got none. I've tried both 8.4.x and > 8.5, but none of those really wanted to make aMSN work, when installed > in dirrerent directories. Anything I should know about your system, that > I can try here to see if it works? > I've tested the compiling tcl. tk and amsn from scratch and it do work. :) So I guess we can remove tcl-tk, but do we really want to? Shouldn't we keep it some time more so that tcl-tk is phased out gracefully instead of as a forced upgrade. -- /Jonas Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
