On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Michael Homer <mich...@gobolinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real > <luca...@gobolinux.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jonas Karlsson <cj.karls...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2009/12/8 <luca...@svn.gobolinux.org>: >>>> Author: lucasvr >>>> Date: 2009-12-08 02:56:57 -0800 (Tue, 08 Dec 2009) >>>> New Revision: 4198 >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> branches/015/Scripts/share/ >>>> Removed: >>>> branches/015/Scripts/Shared/ >>>> Log: >>>> Shared -> share >>>> >>> Don't we still need Shared to hold the application specific files >>> while share is a symlink to /S/I/share? >> >> Not with /System/Index anymore. Apps are compiled with >> prefix=/System/Index, so they will all search for shared files under >> /System/Index/share. The Shared + share scheme would only be useful if >> we were to support legacy packages, but I don't think that's worth it, >> as those can always be recompiled. > I don't think it needs to be possible to install older packages, but I > do want it to be possible to migrate an existing system if it's > remotely doable. That probably means keeping some support for the > share/Shared link in at least SymlinkProgram. Eventually everything > would have been upgraded and it won't be an issue any more, but it > will be during the transition.
Having that support in SymlinkProgram is better, then. I can commit support for that in the 015 branch tomorrow after I start to migrate some old packages to my new rootfs. -- Lucas "If you're looking for a reason I've a reason to give: pleasure, little treasure" _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
