2009/12/22 Lucas C. Villa Real <luca...@gobolinux.org>:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jonas Karlsson <cj.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/12/19 <luca...@svn.gobolinux.org>:
>>> Author: lucasvr
>>> Date: 2009-12-18 21:20:36 -0800 (Fri, 18 Dec 2009)
>>> New Revision: 4244
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> branches/015/Compile/bin/UnionSandbox
>>> Log:
>>> Bring unionfs back to life in ChrootCompile.
>>>
>>> Modified: branches/015/Compile/bin/UnionSandbox
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- branches/015/Compile/bin/UnionSandbox 2009-12-19 04:14:30 UTC
>>> (rev 4243)
>>> +++ branches/015/Compile/bin/UnionSandbox 2009-12-19 05:20:36 UTC
>>> (rev 4244)
>>> @@ -187,12 +187,15 @@
>>> echo "#!/bin/bash" >"${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> echo "cd $newpwd" >>"${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> Args_To_Array command >> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> -echo "mkdir -p $goboDevices; mount -t tmpfs none $goboDevices" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> -echo "mkdir -p $goboStatus; mount -t proc none $goboStatus" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> -echo "cp -aR \"${goboLibraries}/udev/devices/\"* $goboDevices" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> -if Executable_Exists_In_Path "udevadm"
>>> -then echo "udevadm trigger && udevadm settle --timeout=10" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> -else echo "udevtrigger && udevsettle" >> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> +if [ "$unionbackend" != "unionfs" ]
>>> +then
>>> + echo "mkdir -p $goboDevices; mount -t tmpfs none $goboDevices" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> + echo "mkdir -p $goboStatus; mount -t proc none $goboStatus" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> + echo "cp -aR \"${goboLibraries}/udev/devices/\"* $goboDevices" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> + if Executable_Exists_In_Path "udevadm"
>>> + then echo "udevadm trigger && udevadm settle --timeout=10" >>
>>> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> + else echo "udevtrigger && udevsettle" >> "${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>> + fi
>>> fi
>>> echo "\"\${comma...@]}\"" >>"${sandbox_mp}/.wrapper"
>>>
>> Why doesn't unionfs need these entries in the wrapper?
>
> Because when we attempt to access /proc in the sandbox we will get a
> stale directory. It looks like it gets pretty confused when procfs is
> mounted under the union-mounts, at least with the latest kernel.
>
So how is unionfs supposed to access /proc and /dev?
--
/Jonas
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
