The suggestions of generics discussed here and in the referenced documentation, will it be possible to compile the "Go-with-generics" language into some idiomatic Go and compile it with the standard compiler? (I guess *what* idiomatic means is the real question here..). Or would it break idiomatic Go?
If it won't break it, wouldn't it be better to add some of this instead of leaving some of these important matters out? (I have read a guy mention concurrency and Haskell; the language is so flexible that it may be added any way. And it has. So there is no standard way for it) Also, would it be possible to add generics around channels to (limit their functionality I assume (like not legal to address both sides of a channel in the same goroutine (I know it's sometimes nice)))? And make formal analysis (like transformation from Go-with-generics to CSPm) easier? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
