Hi Wanton, Thanks for the adjustment. Henry's solution which you've ++ed seems a bit «javascript-ish» and (IMO) a bit more prone to errors with scoping.
On Monday, 30 January 2017 11:01:15 UTC-5, jul.s...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > Where I work, we are currently experimenting with golang in order to > migrate our existing Perl codebase to golang. > > Although Perl isn't a pure OO language, it allows for a lot of the OO > patterns to be used. One of the patterns we do use is where a superclass > method wraps a series of call to other methods that can be overloaded by > subclasses. > > Here is an example of what I mean: > https://goo.gl/hTnUI4 > > Now, I've tried to apply the same principle in golang but failed as the > method attack isn't called on the right type: > https://play.golang.org/p/ZHhaQhSrms > > I've scratched my head for a bit to find a solution for this, and the idea > I found was to wrap the prep+attack call in a function that isn't tied to > any of the two structs > https://play.golang.org/p/7nK8xEV5rj > > The example above creates the behaviour I initially expected but I don't > find its as clean as when using the classic OO pattern. > > Now my question is, how do people usually translate this classic OO > pattern into golang other than the way I found ? > > Thanks ! > > - Julien > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.